On 7/9/2014 at 04:24 PM, Ed Finnell
000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
Wonder if SHARE has Mobile plans?
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.coreapps.android.followme.share_inc
Mark Post
Linux Project Manager
SHARE
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 01:25:21 -0600, Mark Post wrote:
Wonder if SHARE has Mobile plans?
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.coreapps.android.followme.share_inc
Now that's starting to look useful.
Wonder how good it is at resolving conflicts - such a problem at Share as there
is
In 21c7a156-000c-4c46-94b1-2d0127f14...@comcast.net, on 07/08/2014
at 05:50 PM, Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net said:
Maybe the problem is you got into this position by your own
permissive behavior
The problem is not putting unsupported software into production; the
problem is putting code
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 01:25 -0600, Mark Post wrote:
On 7/9/2014 at 04:24 PM, Ed Finnell
000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
Wonder if SHARE has Mobile plans?
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.coreapps.android.followme.share_inc
Holycow, that requires an
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of David Andrews
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 14:18
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Check out IBM Redbooks | IBM Redbooks Mobile App
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 01:25 -0600, Mark Post
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:18:19 -0400, David Andrews wrote:
Holycow, that requires an awful lot of permissions! What are they
DOING?
...
Not just No, but Hell, no.
ROTFLMAO ... dammit fella, I bet you even read EULAs ...
The permissions all (Android) apps demand (not ask, demand) are ridiculous.
On 7/10/2014 1:18 AM, Shane Ginnane wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 01:25:21 -0600, Mark Post wrote:
Wonder if SHARE has Mobile plans?
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.coreapps.android.followme.share_inc
Now that's starting to look useful.
Wonder how good it is at resolving
Just bringing up z/OS 2.1. When I enter ISPF, the IBM copyright notice box
shows up on the primary menu. I thought that was only for the first time,
but it displays every time I enter from Ready. Is there an option I'm
missing?
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:14:33 -0700, Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
wrote:
Just bringing up z/OS 2.1. When I enter ISPF, the IBM copyright notice box
shows up on the primary menu. I thought that was only for the first time,
but it displays every time I enter from Ready. Is there an option
Skip Robinson wrote:
Just bringing up z/OS 2.1. When I enter ISPF, the IBM copyright notice box
shows up on the primary menu. I thought that was only for the first time, but
it displays every time I enter from Ready. Is there an option I'm missing?
Easy to fix it. Just simulate an ENTER and
Interesting. We also modify ISR@PRIM but never messed with logo logic.
Same usermod for 2.1 as for 1.13, different result. (I use ISPF or PDF
command, not a script.) Need more research. Thanks for the tips.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
My mod to ISR@PRIM.
IF (ZLOGO = 'YES') /* CK@MJC*/
IF (ZSPLIT = 'NO') /* Not in split screen@L5A*/
IF (ZCMD = Z)/* No command pending @L5A*/
IF (ZLOGOPAN ^= 'DONE') /* No logo displayed yet @L5A*/
/*
Anyone have any ideas for a quick fix for this type of situation?
GIM54701E ** ALLOCATION FAILED FOR SMP00027 - IKJ56246I DATA SET CEE.SCEELKED
NOT ALLOCATED, FILE IN USE.
GIM54601E ** DYNAMIC ALLOCATION FAILED FOR SMP00027 BECAUSE SCEELKED IS PART OF
THE SMP00027 CONCATENATION
Yikes! It looks like SMPE is going after your production library. You
should be pointing to an installation-only library that's used only by
SMPE.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
Has anyone successfully added code to a Rexx EXEC to intercept program
abends?
Thanks!
*George Rodriguez*
*Specialist II - IT Solutions*
*IT Enterprise Applications*
*PX - 47652*
*(561) 357-7652 (office)*
*(561) 707-3496 (mobile)*
*School District of Palm Beach County*
*3348 Forest Hill Blvd.*
Did you try SIGNAL ON ERROR/FAILURE?
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:37:20 -0400 George Rodriguez
george.rodrig...@palmbeachschools.org wrote:
:Has anyone successfully added code to a Rexx EXEC to intercept program
:abends?
--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Yep I did... I even read the manual and found this:
ISPEXEC CONTROL SUBTASK PROTECT
But it doesn't work...
*George Rodriguez*
*Specialist II - IT Solutions*
*IT Enterprise Applications*
*PX - 47652*
*(561) 357-7652 (office)*
*(561) 707-3496 (mobile)*
*School District of Palm Beach County*
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:21:32 -0400 Rob JACKSON rwjackso...@msn.com wrote:
:Anyone have any ideas for a quick fix for this type of situation?
:
:GIM54701E ** ALLOCATION FAILED FOR SMP00027 - IKJ56246I DATA SET CEE.SCEELKED
NOT ALLOCATED, FILE IN USE.
:GIM54601E ** DYNAMIC ALLOCATION
/* REXX */
SIGNAL ON ERROR
ALLOC F(SYSIN) DUMMY
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 10:28:46 -0700, Skip Robinson wrote:
Yikes! It looks like SMPE is going after your production library. You
should be pointing to an installation-only library that's used only by
SMPE.
Be careful; that's FILE IN USE; not DATA SET IN USE.
This is a good time to wonder why
Let me try to conclude this thread as it has drifted apart from the original
question to the question whether an 8 char (MVS) userid can become valid TSO
user (which it *cannot*).
My interest was to find out why some TSO commands can be used in a *batch* job
while others (which?) cannot when
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 21:16:14 +0200, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
Let me try to conclude this thread as it has drifted apart from the original
question to the question whether an 8 char (MVS) userid can become valid TSO
user (which it *cannot*).
My interest was to find out why some TSO commands can be
Could you run it and share the results?
Will do.
--
Peter
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:21:32 -0400, Rob JACKSON wrote:
Anyone have any ideas for a quick fix for this type of situation?
GIM54701E ** ALLOCATION FAILED FOR SMP00027 - IKJ56246I DATA SET CEE.SCEELKED
NOT ALLOCATED, FILE IN USE.
GIM54601E ** DYNAMIC ALLOCATION FAILED FOR SMP00027
_Winter 2014 Anaheim: Exploiting z/OS - Tales From the MVS Survey_
(https://share.confex.com/share/122/webprogram/Session15044.html)
This was last MVS Survey. About 2.3Mb pdf.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Looks like a DB/2 APPLY. Don't think it updates SCEELKED but needs the PDS
to resolve the BIND.
Do a find on DDDEFS to see where it's pointing. Modify ZONE to specify SHR
as DISP.
In a message dated 7/10/2014 3:14:47 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:14:36 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:21:32 -0400, Rob JACKSON wrote:
Anyone have any ideas for a quick fix for this type of situation?
GIM54701E ** ALLOCATION FAILED FOR SMP00027 - IKJ56246I DATA SET CEE.SCEELKED
NOT ALLOCATED, FILE IN USE. ...
Roger, The TS7700 doesn't care what you write on the tape, but the system tends
to want them all to be standard label.
However, I do recall that we made specific support in DFSMSrmm to support both
non-specific NL and specific NL processing in all system managed tapes.
However, you do need the
Paul,
Think about it a little bit and you can come up easily with a reason.
Ed
On Jul 10, 2014, at 1:32 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 10:28:46 -0700, Skip Robinson wrote:
Yikes! It looks like SMPE is going after your production library. You
should be pointing to an
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 18:50:40 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
Think about it a little bit and you can come up easily with a reason.
Nope. I'll need help on that. I've noticed it for a few years and got no
ideas.
On Jul 10, 2014, at 1:32 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Be careful; that's FILE IN USE; not
Paul,
When SMPE builds the input to the link editor (binder) it does this:
include (ddname of the library the module is included from ie
alinklib (as an example) include alinklib(iew)
The ddname is in the case we are talking is either the library where
the module reside or the DISTLIB .
At 15:14 -0500 on 07/10/2014, Tom Marchant wrote about Re: SMP/E
APPLY CHECK failing:
Most likely you have DISP=OLD on SCEELKED. It should be SHR.
True. OTOH, this is also fall-out from the allocation ENQs being
broken for years. The RNAME being used is DSN NOT DSN+VOLSER like
ISPF does.
Volser ???
Not mentioned here
http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v2r1/topic/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.f54pc00/isppcaxdsie.htm
Hank
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
33 matches
Mail list logo
