I would say if they want more than the three system files you just
send them the whole job.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Brian Westerman
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We had several user requests (at least 200) for the automatic StepCC/MaxCC
> eMail/SMS text product to allow the JES system datasets to be
Hi,
We had several user requests (at least 200) for the automatic StepCC/MaxCC
eMail/SMS text product to allow the JES system datasets to be attached to the
email, so that besides the stepCC's and MaxCC, the user can receive any or all
of the JESJCL, JESMSGLG, and JESYSLG as attachments. I add
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.gim1000/lmodacc.htm?lang=en
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Ed Gould wrote:
> Paul:
>
> I am not going to do your homework.
> IDENTIFY is a valid binder control statement so it must work in SMPE.
>
>
> Ed
>
>
> On Nov
Paul:
I am not going to do your homework.
IDENTIFY is a valid binder control statement so it must work in SMPE.
Ed
On Nov 30, 2014, at 11:10 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:53:22 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
A large percent (all?) of IBM SMP maintenance comes along with a
setssi
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:53:22 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
>A large percent (all?) of IBM SMP maintenance comes along with a
>setssi card.
>
>Not exactly what I was looking for but I think it will do:
>http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/gim3rf01.pdf
>
>v The only IMASPZAP control statements allowed
A large percent (all?) of IBM SMP maintenance comes along with a
setssi card.
Not exactly what I was looking for but I think it will do:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/gim3rf01.pdf
v The only IMASPZAP control statements allowed in a SYSMOD are:
Control statements
ABSDUMP DUMP NAME VE
On 26 Nov 2014 05:31:13 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>I also am having a problem with downloads from ShopzSeries. I wasn't on
>IBM-MAIN yesterday. I started a PMR yesterday afternoon and got this relpy:
>
>There was an issue reported that was making that message appear.
>The intern
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 16:05:04 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
>It sure does.
>
Cite?
Thanks,
gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I setup a filter in gmail to send all IBM-MAIN stuff to its own folder (or
label?), and my experience is that nothing (IBM-MAIN-wise) then gets sent
to spam - the filter overrides it.
On 30 November 2014 at 08:07, Ed Finnell <
000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> It's at the b
It sure does.
Ed
On Nov 30, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 09:03:18 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
The availability of control-section specific IDRs and the IDENTIFY
binder control statement have, however, made SETSSI obsolescent.
Does SMP/E support the Binder IDENT
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 13:19:31 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
>
>One formats the text of an IDENTIFY control statement as a sequence of
>character set symbols that are card images. AINSERT is then used to
>'save' them, and AREAD is used to put them into the output.
>
Feels a lot like PUNCH. This real
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014m.html#87 Death of spinning disk?
Want a 100TB disk drive? You'll have to wait 'til 2025; Heated Dot
Magnetic Recording combines future technologies for a 10X capacity
improvement
http://www.computerworld.com/article/2852233/want-a-100tb-disk-drive-youll-have-to
Issue K Q,L=consolename to clear the backlog
To see the backlog information , issue D C,B and look out for NBUF value in
the output
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
> I am not sure what you mean by "backlog"
>
> Is the console buffering?
> What do you see when you do a D
. . . sorry about that!
One formats the text of an IDENTIFY control statement as a sequence of
character set symbols that are card images. AINSERT is then used to
'save' them, and AREAD is used to put them into the output.
I would be happy to work through an example with you.
On 11/30/14, John
About Linker IDENTIFY control statement Paul Gilmartin wrote
| Can this information be supplied from HLASM (but
| this would be harder for us to automate.)
The answer is yes. The only sequencing requirement is that a
sections IDENTIFYs must follow it (or, of course, its insertion
point).
One f
Peter,
Having been involved with caching in prior employment, not IBM, your
explanation of just letting normal trimming take care of it is what makes the
most sense and is what I have done in the past. If the cache is very active it
will age-out fast enough and if it gets referenced again befor
sipp...@sg.ibm.com (Timothy Sipples) writes:
> Percentage/ratio cost differences are not *exactly* what drive cost-based
> decisions. To illustrate why, consider these two hypothetical scenarios:
>
> 1. A 1 TB hard disk costs $100 and a 1 TB SSD costs $1000.
> 2. A 1 TB hard disk costs $1 and a 1 T
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 11:51:39 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 09:03:18 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
>>
>>The availability of control-section specific IDRs and the IDENTIFY
>>binder control statement have, however, made SETSSI obsolescent.
>>
>Does SMP/E support the Binder IDENTIFY s
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 09:03:18 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
>
>The availability of control-section specific IDRs and the IDENTIFY
>binder control statement have, however, made SETSSI obsolescent.
>
Does SMP/E support the Binder IDENTIFY statement? I don't see it
mentioned among LKED CONTROL in:
L
>Now, please put your wisdom in IBM books.
I think that most of my post was discussing internal details that are not
suitable for documentation (where by documenting them, customers and
programmers are allowed to rely on them, which in turn may hamstring
future desire to change). If there are p
If the module is in LPA, there is no need to use the MODADDR keyword.
If the module is in the LNKLST or you used the DSNAME keyword and you use
MODADDR, I surely hope that you used the STOKEN keyword.
Otherwise, if the module is in the LNKLSTor you used the DSNAME keyword,
it is usually best to l
The binder's continuing support for SETSSI and the system status index
is entirely appropriate: historically, they have been used for many
purposes.
The availability of control-section specific IDRs and the IDENTIFY
binder control statement have, however, made SETSSI obsolescent.
SETSSI sets the
Thanks for your replies. Clearer now.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Percentage/ratio cost differences are not *exactly* what drive cost-based
decisions. To illustrate why, consider these two hypothetical scenarios:
1. A 1 TB hard disk costs $100 and a 1 TB SSD costs $1000.
2. A 1 TB hard disk costs $1 and a 1 TB SSD costs $10.
In both cases the SSD is 10 times mo
It's at the bottom of every IBM-Main post.
Just send unsub ibm-main to listserv and that's it.
In a message dated 11/30/2014 12:23:22 A.M. Central Standard Time,
linda.lst...@comcast.net writes:
Many lists do not contain unsubscribe directions and links. That would
take up a great deal o
25 matches
Mail list logo
