I'll remind that while you can build a structure that mimics the EXEC
PGM= structure and use LINK, you should not assume that using LINK will
work.
A program that is documented to work with EXEC PGM= may require that
environment and may not work via LINK.
If you're authorized, it's up to you
Peter:
The command in question runs in TSO/E Option # 6 and can be executed via
IKJEFT01 in batch. With these two options being true , can i write a
command processor using IKJEFSI,IKJEFSR ..etc. ?
My issue is we run as a STC ...i want to be able to call establish a
temporary TSO environment and
If you are monitoring real-time.
Otherwise, you have to depend on SMF.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Mike Shorkend
Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2015 12:14
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Jobs at a given time
If available, you could use RMF
If available, you could use RMF monitor III, panel 'PU'
On 31 January 2015 at 05:17, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
There are also interval accounting which can do that.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: John McKown
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 16:12
To:
Ah. Then you need to LINK or whatever to IKJEFT01 passing a parm off R1 of
'command parameters ...'
Let me know if that is too brief a description.
The above will work but not sure what the ramifications are, however, if you
establish a TSO environment in a long-running job such as a started
Scott:
I am not sure I agree with Charles (as to being fairly resource
intensive). Address space create is probably more intensive but that
is mostly an initiator duty than establishing a TSO environment.
\
Ed
On Feb 1, 2015, at 4:12 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
Charles,
I think I am going to
Charles,
I think I am going to try another way, using CA macros
Hopefully, this will permit us to pass commands and retrieve output.
Regards,
Scott
On Sunday, February 1, 2015, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Establishing a TSO environment is also fairly resource-intensive (I
think?).
Establishing a TSO environment is also fairly resource-intensive (I think?). Do
you intend to do this once an hour or once a second? If the latter, you might
want to figure out how to set up a persistent TSO environment. Whether IKJEFT01
does that, and if not, how to do so, are beyond my pay
On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 14:30:26 -0500, Scott Ford idfzos...@gmail.com wrote:
The command in question runs in TSO/E Option # 6 and can be executed via
IKJEFT01 in batch. With these two options being true , can i write a
command processor using IKJEFSI,IKJEFSR ..etc. ?
My issue is we run as a STC ...i
Scott,
I suggest that you look at the RACF R_admin (IRRSEQ00) callable service, which
can be used to pass commands to and retrieve output from CA Trop Secret
Security.
You can use it from a batch assembler program, and you do NOT require a TSO
environment, and the overhead that establishing a
That would depend on how you define real time.RMF monitor III can keep
weeks of data.
On Feb 1, 2015 7:46 PM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
If you are monitoring real-time.
Otherwise, you have to depend on SMF.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Mike Shorkend
Sent: Sunday,
The above will work but not sure what the ramifications are, however, if
you establish a TSO environment in a long-running job such as a started
task.
The most obvious one is that you cannot stop (p) the STC that has a batch TSO
environment. You will always have to cancel it, unless
12 matches
Mail list logo
