On 10/03/2015 7:02 AM, Sam Siegel wrote:
64 bit memory is the cleanest in terms of using linear addresses. However,
if data needs to be referenced by COBOL, you will face problems. You might
need to copy back data to 31bit address space or other means.
dataspaces cannot be directly accesses by
Apologies. My nephew mentioned they were having big sales at the Health
food store for Pi day. I just picked the first one with pretty pictures.
In a message dated 3/10/2015 12:52:49 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za writes:
Sorry to burst your Pi bubble, but that
Ed Finnell wrote:
>Apologies. My nephew mentioned they were having big sales at the Health food
>store for Pi day. I just picked the first one with pretty pictures.
No need to apologise. I enjoyed your post and the link. I also got a mail
privately from a friend about this date (and the other o
They're a local establishment. Specializing in natural and preservative
free offerings.
_www.mannagrocery.com_ (http://www.mannagrocery.com)
In a message dated 3/10/2015 4:00:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za writes:
Please send over the food from Health foo
More likely IEFUSI or similar. Hiperspace is NOT in the 31-bit (or 64-bit)
memory map. That's the point of it.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebo
I wonder if Data Windowing Services is still around. I vaguely recall they
used Hiperspaces (still perfectly valid but mapped to Central).
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@
Thanks Kirk, that helps.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Kirk Wolf
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 3:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: John Eells Item
I don't speak for IBM, but I read the announcements to s
On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 22:53:46 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
>Not to rain on anyone's parade, but I shared it with co-workers who
>promptly showed it to the boss and the boss came over to me and said
>if they have that kind of Money to throw away looks like SHARE is out
>of the budget next year and the fore
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 09:37:42 +, Martin Packer wrote:
>More likely IEFUSI or similar. Hiperspace is NOT in the 31-bit (or 64-bit)
>memory map. That's the point of it.
>
Are you saying that it's there in case 64-bit is not enough?
-- gil
---
Alan:
I was thinking along the lines of what you suggested. cant suggest as a
ISV and developer to customers to use CICS or DB2 as a solution.
I personally think its overkill for a system type application which we
are..besides we handle sensitive security type data.
Regards,
Scott
On Tue, Mar 1
Approximately, but not exactly ...
Vacation Notice:
- none currently scheduled -
Tom Puddicombe
Principal Systems Engineer
Mainframe Performance & Capacity Planning
CSC
31 Brookdale Rd, Meriden, CT 06450
ITIS | (860) 428-3252 | tpudd...@csc.com | www.csc.com
This is a PRIVATE message. If yo
Thinking about DFSORT and UNICODE. locale -a tells me these should be valid:
user@OS/390.24.00: locale -a | grep En_US.*8859
En_US.ISO8859-1.lp64
En_US.ISO8859-1.xplink
However:
user@OS/390.24.00: LC_ALL=En_US.ISO8859-1.lp64 locale
Really? All your "co-workers" are spending the day watching videos on You Tube
and the only thing the "boss" complains about (to you directly) is what he
perceives the cost of the video to be? That sounds odd.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM
If you have seen an issue with sorting, did you open an SR/PMR with IBM on it?
If not, how can it get resolved?
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 11:15 PM
> To
On 15Mar09:2144-0700, Charles Mills wrote:
> On 15Mar09:2054-, Ed Gould wrote:
>>
>> Not to rain on anyone's parade, but I shared it with co-workers who promptly
>> showed it to the boss and the boss came over to me and said if they have
>> that kind of Money to throw away looks like SHARE is
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 06:46:30 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>If you have seen an issue with sorting, did you open an SR/PMR with IBM on it?
>
Yes.
>If not, how can it get resolved?
>
Apparently PMR makes no difference. They called it WAD.
-- gil
---
Hiperspace came along about 22 years before 64-bit ANYTHING, let alone
64-Bit Virtual.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blo
And if you go sub-second the rest of the digits are there too
CIT | Ken Porowski | VP Mainframe Engineering | Information Technology | +1 973
740 5459 (tel) | ken.porow...@cit.com
This email message and any accompanying materials may contain proprietary,
privileged and confidential informa
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:14:55 +, Martin Packer wrote:
>Hiperspace came along about 22 years before 64-bit ANYTHING, let alone
>64-Bit Virtual.
>
Nowadays, what advantage does hiperspace offer over 64-bit?
Performance, perhaps?
>From: Paul Gilmartin
>Date: 10/03/2015 12:29
>
>On Tue, 10 Ma
Rebbeca Black's family paid $4,000 (of $8-10,000 cost) for the video
for the song Friday, and that is professionals.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friday_(Rebecca_Black_song)
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Tom Marchant
<000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 2
Doability when you don't have a chance to do 64 Bit. :-( :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/dev
Gil,
It seems you hate DFSORT with passion and blame everything on DFSORT even
though it is NOT. Let see the problems you faced so far.
>>>FSUMA912 Cannot set locale: The internationalization variable settings
are invalid.
The error message FSUMA912 is NOT even a DFSORT message and if you look
We have a weird problem when executing a MENU transaction we receive garbage
back to the screen
It was working fine under 4.2, after bringing up 5.1 on our TECH LPAR we ran
into this issue
We changed STOargeclear to yes on the transaction and seems to work again.
Anyone know why it would need to
I tried to cross post this to, not sure if I have correct address -
Thanks again
cic...@listserv.uga.edu
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of August Carideo/RYE/US
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 2:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV
sipp...@sg.ibm.com (Timothy Sipples) writes:
> The IBM z13's ~139 SIMD instructions are different and new, yes. I expect
> that they represent a perfect functional superset of the long ago
> discontinued S/390 Vector Facility. However, it's probably not particularly
> useful to draw many parallels
I just received word of this and thought others on the list might find it
interesting.
Compuware is hosting a webcast with renowned expert in technology economics,
Dr. Howard Rubin. Dr. Rubin will be presenting his most recent findings on the
growing consumption of technology and its impact on
CICS stopped initializing working storage to low values a couple of releases
ago. Most shops fixed this by 1) enforcing good application programming
practices or 2) creating a region specific CEEROPT module to force all working
storage to low values. You probably had a CEEROPT in your TS 4.2 D
Wow, those are big numbers! Thank you, Tom.
This seems to be a good thing to be shared with techies, but specially with
management. I'm looking forward to it.
Thanks,
---
*L
Timothy,
thanks for the pointer and the additional information.
Apart from personal interest, my primary focus is in creating support
for the new instructions in the z390 emulator for HLASM and runtime support.
As such I am more interested in the technicalities than in the broad
overview.
If
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 17:29:54 +0200, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
>I am running a MPF exit that works fine from user adress spaces. In respond
>to RACF msg ICH302D, the userid assigned is +CONSOLE. The OPERCMDS profile
>is having uacc read, but racf refuses the REPLYxx,Y
>Another command issued under the
If my notes are accurate from Ross' Keynote address to SHARE attendees in
Seattle, mainframes account for 68% of production workloads, but only 6% of IT
spend (exclusive of aggregate labor costs across platforms). Given the armies
of sysadmins to support *nix and windoze platforms, I gotta beli
On Mar 10, 2015, at 7:02 AM, Tom Marchant wrote:
-SNIP-
That sounds like a lame excuse to me. Haven't you posted that you
haven't
been to SHARE in ages? When was the last time that the boss sent
anyone
to SHARE?
I let the "kids" go un
I'm 90% sure of the answer but would like confirmation. We have a JES2
automatic command that's executes once an hour (T=3600) with no specific start
time. Before the Sunday Daylight Saving Time switch, this command was executing
at 45 minutes past the hour. Immediately after the time switch, it
Greg:
I "work" for a non profit and every penny is accounted for and approved.
I am a "senior" person here who volunteers his time although I am not
an "employee" I am considered one of the group . I also spear headed
the quest to join SHARE so I am one of the first to be "dinged" when
anyt
I don't know if I would infer that JES2 resyncs to the top of the hour. I
would infer that JES2 simply restarted its 3600 second timer at the point of
time the time changed. I would guess that if, for example, at 5:35 PM you
changed the time to 5:36 PM, your hourly automatic command would star
That's what my notes say. Mainframe 68% of the work; 6% of the budget (Linux
19%; Windows 11%). Don't have work numbers for the other platforms.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Art Gutowski
Sent: Tuesday, Marc
arthur.gutow...@gm.com (Art Gutowski) writes:
> If my notes are accurate from Ross' Keynote address to SHARE attendees
> in Seattle, mainframes account for 68% of production workloads, but
> only 6% of IT spend (exclusive of aggregate labor costs across
> platforms). Given the armies of sysadmins
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 21:53:46 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>I don't know if I would infer that JES2 resyncs to the top of the hour. I
>would infer that JES2 simply restarted its 3600 second timer at the point of
>time the time changed. I would guess that if, for example, at 5:35 PM you
>changed
Actually 'resetting at the moment of time change' is probably a better
characterization. STP changes the time offset at the top of the hour, so timer
intervals would reset to that. BTW I should have said that the auto command has
I=3600, not T=.
.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edis
Per the new PoOps:
LZRG R1,D2(X2,B2) [RXY-a]
The second operand, with the rightmost byte set to zero, is placed
at the first-operand location. [snip] for LZRG, the first and second
operands are 64 bits.
I guess my imagination fails me, so I have to ask... Why?
Dave Cole
ColeSoft Market
Ed, why don't you tell us exactly how much you and the other VOLUNTEERS got
paid for that video??
I think your statement should read:
Besides the drummer and singer, all folks featured are SHARE VOLUNTEERS. In
order
of appearance:
Ed Jaffe, Sandra Pancoast, Buzz Woeckener, James Vincent, Harr
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:36:30 -0500, Art Gutowski wrote:
>Given the armies of sysadmins to support *nix and windoze platforms, I gotta
>believe labor costs on these platforms eclipse those of the mainframe.
As Lynn mentions, the move to cloud affects them too - maybe most of all.
"The time of the
Reading Kolosu's latest admonishment to gil, I trundled through the links for
completeness.
The first (knowledgecentre) took minutes to load - yes *minutes*. The others
just "popped up".
Another great technological leap backwards.
Shane ...
-
AMEN!
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Shane Ginnane
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Knowledgecentre versus the library server
Reading Kolosu's latest admonishment to
Windows support costs are hard to identify. We know who supports the mainframe;
they work for mainframe IT. But Windows in each department is supported in his
"spare time" by that bright computer whiz kid in that department, and he is on
their payroll.
Charles
-Original Message-
From:
I would say it ran at 0145 xST. At 0301 xDT, the 1 hour had elapsed,
so it ran it immediately.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:51 PM, J O Skip Robinson
wrote:
> I'm 90% sure of the answer but would like confirmation. We have a JES2
> automatic command that's executes once an hour (T=3600) with no spe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-NpLu2xC38
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@list
Mike is right.
At 2:01 you've "added" 3600s (to make it 3:01), so JES2 tried to catch up
as the interval had already been more than satisfied.
This reminds me of our last fallback timechange when one of the techies
issued a JES2 command to schedule the SET CLOCK before midnight. JES2 tried
to catc
Is there a link to the keynote or the data presented during the keynote?
Lo
--
Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity
- Unknown
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Art Gutowski
wrote:
> If my notes are accurate from Ross' Keynote address to SHARE attendees in
> Seattle, mainf
Lucas Rosalen wrote:
>Mike is right.
>At 2:01 you've "added" 3600s (to make it 3:01), so JES2 tried to catch up as
>the interval had already been more than satisfied.
Indeed and this is documented,
If, at 1:15 a.m., the clock is set ahead two hours, making the current time
3:15 a.m., the co
50 matches
Mail list logo
