>Our development management are telling is (Systems & Operations) that
>it is "cheaper to Upgrade the mainfame than to have the application
>programmers review their code for performance oppurtunities".
I'm disappointed in the reactions so far. They're quite...old
fashioned. :-( Yes, there is a "n
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
> >Our development management are telling is (Systems & Operations) that
> >it is "cheaper to Upgrade the mainfame than to have the application
> >programmers review their code for performance oppurtunities".
>
> I'm disappointed in the react
Let me guess, they still didn't bother to add a test for
table-size-exceeded to perform a "graceful failure" of the transaction
rather than take out the entire CICS region when the increased table
eventually proves inadequate; and if just increasing max table sizes
greatly increased CPU, then no do
Timothy has some points and some not so valid points.
Lets put it one way Timothy works for IBM and as such has an inherent
bias about the subject matter.
As for my opinion, I think its worth a few bodies (currently employed
at your place of business) that are probably senior senior types.
I t
>Highly skilled development talent takes performance and resource
>utilization into consideration during design, development, turning and
>testing.
Agreed, but only to the degree merited in the circumstances. Highly skilled
development talent and management also know where best to allocate their
p
Hi,
will settting SPINRCVY to SPIN allow a CPU to sping endlesssly
as leaving out the SPINTIME paramter seem to make it default to 40 seconds
if not is there a way to make a CPU keep spining and have z/os take no
action
thanks
-
