Walt Farrell wrote:
>The key point is that the DFDSS enforces security, and the ADMINISTRATOR
>keyword usage must be controlled, because it's purpose is to bypass certain
>other security checks.
I certainly know it. I just took this example to illustrate my point. I could
use other examples i
Shane Ginnane wrote:
Shane ...
(interesting Tom commented on the PCI thread, but not this that I noticed ...)
I'm here! Yes, Vista can handle code page 1047 and in fact that's been
the default for many years (ever since I started coding C on the
mainframe). SPUFI complains (at least by defaul
Hi Team,
Thanks for your response
As per your suggestion i changed java version from 1.8 to 1.7 , I can
able to login via I.E but this time my ID was forcibly disconnected
for the reason "contact your support person to determine if your
browser is configured properly to connect to the conso
On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:36:41 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> I don't pursue cosmetic changes to 3270.
>
>The data sets I use are NFS exported. I use desktop editors. My
>principal need for 3270 is for SDSF; lesser for DSLIST and DDLIST.
People who do real work on the host need 3270.
I'm with Dav
Phil Smith wrote:
> ... and when decommissioning hardware-no more "How many DSEs should
we > do? or "Should we take the drives out back, shoot ‘em with a
12-gauge, > and then drop ‘em in the ocean?".
Now you're spoiling all the fun! But that's a really good point I never
heard before.
As a
Todd Arnold wrote:
>The article you referenced seems to assume whole-disk encryption is always
>implemented using software on your computer, since it says "the operating
>system has the decryption key to access the disk". That is not true, of
>course, for self-encrypting disk drives (or tape dr
The article you referenced seems to assume whole-disk encryption is always
implemented using software on your computer, since it says "the operating
system has the decryption key to access the disk". That is not true, of
course, for self-encrypting disk drives (or tape drives) where the encrypt
I went in via CBT link and yuck has it changed or what? Anyway ended up in
some semblance of Bookie.
Both .boo and .pdf versions. Could I get there again, not sure.
http://www-05.ibm.com/e-business/linkweb/publications/servlet/pbi.wss?SSN=15
ERU653543241&FNC=PBL&PBL=SC23-8526-00&TRL=TXTSR
Steve,
This is the direct link for IBM PDF manuals. Do a search for "Enterprise
COBOL" on the page
www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/zswpdf/
Thanks,
Kolusu
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on
05/18/2015 12:30:02 PM:
> From: Steve Thompson
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Dat
Try:
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/zswpdf/#Enterprise%20COBOL%20for%20z/OS%20V4R1%20PDFs%20%28Disc%202%29
watch the wrap.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Steve Thompson
Sent: Monday, May 18,
Will this help:
http://www-05.ibm.com/e-business/linkweb/publications/servlet/pbi.wss?SSN=15ERT0006458284229&FNC=SRH
Lizette
-Original Message-
>From: Steve Thompson
>Sent: May 18, 2015 12:30 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Help with getting a link
>
>I am having a problem w
I am having a problem with certificates. Not one I can fix.
As a result, I can't use Google or Yahoo from FF.
And when I try IBM's site direct, I get a web page about them
having a problem.
Would anyone have a link to the PDFs for COBOL V4R1 for z/OS?
Regards,
Steve Thompson
---
On Mon, 18 May 2015 09:35:17 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht
wrote:
>I don't need help with writing. I am asking whether it is a good thing or not
>to protect individual DFSORT and ICETOOL
>commands/keywords just like you do it with DFDSS ADMINISTRATOR keyword for
>example.
>
>From all the online
Oh No It's Monday Again...back to the scanner and PDFSAM.
In a message dated 5/18/2015 10:37:43 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
stars...@mindspring.com writes:
I have to ask, what is ONIMA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
I have to ask, what is ONIMA
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 8:17 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: DFSORT and RACF
>
> Hey, it was a sordid job but
On Mon, 18 May 2015 19:07:16 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>
>I wish Vista was available for the Mac or Linux where I just cannot find
>a decent 3270 emulator. x3270 just does not cut it.
>
Seven years ago, someone infamously mentioned lipstick in connection
with pigs. I don't pursue cosmetic chang
Hey, it was a sordid job but somebody's got to do it...ONIMA!
In a message dated 5/18/2015 9:35:28 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za writes:
your ice cool ideas and suggestions. Thanks for sorting me out!
---
Sri h Kolusu kindly wrote:
>DFSORT already have some examples of creating ICETOOL reports based on output
>files from the RACF database unload utility (IRRDBU00) or the SMF data unload
>utility (IRRADU00). The SYS1.SAMPLIB member IRRICE contains DFSORT statements
>for record selection and ICETO
Russell Witt wrote:
>Interesting discussion. But taken another step, wouldn't the same also apply
>then to encrypted physical tape? As well as encrypted virtual tape? I believe
>that all physical tape encryption is done in a fashion similar; if you have
>authority to the data the volume will be
On 18/05/2015 6:50 PM, Jantje. wrote:
Q). Can anyone suggest a vendor who's tn3270 solution includes EBCDIC IBM-1047?
When I look at the Web pages I see they support IBM 3270 TCP & SNA, but I don't
get much for details on the codepages supported.
Tom Brennan's Vista 3270. Dirt cheap, but ooz
On Fri, 15 May 2015 18:54:47 +, Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
wrote:
>Dear Emulator Specialists,
Well... I am not a specialist at all in this matter, but I do have my opinion...
>Q). Can anyone suggest a vendor who's tn3270 solution includes EBCDIC
>IBM-1047? When I look at the Web pages I
Rajesh
We had a similar problem which we resolved by changing a Java configuration
option.
I turned on trace in the Java console and could see that Java was trying to go
out on the internet to check a certificate, was timing out (our Remote Desktops
have no internet access), and failing to open
We use IBM TWS as our mainframe scheduler and I have worked on this as
it's previous name OPC which is still used synominously.
/Steve
From: Scott Barry
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 2015-05-15 18:08
Subject:Re: Scheduling software
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion
23 matches
Mail list logo
