Tom,
I "think" (I wrote the requirement), I was the one that requested
SMPE to create the forfmid at SHARE way long time ago. I was having
issues with stringing out the ptfs, mine got to 3 continuation
"cards" . It was for an obscure product that I dearly loved.
Ed
On Aug 15, 2015, at 5:
PERMIT TESTAUTH CLASS(TSOAUTH) ID(TSOID)
ACC(upd)
Sorry someone let me know
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 15, 2015, at 11:28 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>
> Are you seeing an ICH408I Message or S913?
>
> If not, is the TESTSAUTH in the IKJTSOxx member of parmlib?
>
> Lizette
>
>
> -Origi
Are you seeing an ICH408I Message or S913?
If not, is the TESTSAUTH in the IKJTSOxx member of parmlib?
Lizette
-Original Message-
>From: michealbutz
>Sent: Aug 15, 2015 7:25 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: RACF syntax to permit TSO user to use TESTAUTH
>
>Hi
>
>
>
>would an
Hi
would anyone know the RACF command syntax for a TSO id to be authorized to
use TESTAUTH
Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the mess
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.) writes:
> I'm editing the wikipedia article on Count Key Data, and I've run into
> an editorial dispute. I claim that what is now ECKD was part of the
> SMB, and the other editor claims that you could run 3380 on a slow
> channel without using
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 23:12:04 +0530, Nathan Astle wrote:
>Should I be looking into the PE or HIPER for z/OS ? If so what should be
>looking into it especially?
Yes.
You should apply the maintenance that is available, using your standard
methodology.
Everyone has different preferences, but IMO w
Lizzette:
With OS upgrades I pretty much follow you.
What seems to be lost in the haze is when you have major upgrades
(like COBOL or LE). With those two I will take exception.
15 or 20 years ago we had gone through the upgrade. After the upgrade
(with a LOT of battle wounds) I swear IBM hir
I would say if you follow the process of FIXCAT listings and applying what you
need on the target system, you should be fine.
Jump in the pool, the water is fine.
Everything will depend on if you have a standalone system where you can bring
it up and fallback.
There are share presentations.
Review and attend to the Migration Guide Notes.
They are very very helpful.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of David Purdy
> Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2015 10:20 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject
Hi
Should I be looking into the PE or HIPER for z/OS ? If so what should be
looking into it especially?
Nathan
On Saturday 15 August 2015, David Purdy <
00ac4b1d56b3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Everything is well documented. One overlooked documented item was the
> return code c
Everything is well documented. One overlooked documented item was the return
code change from LISTCAT of a GDG base with no entries. V1R13 gave RC = 4. V2R1
RC = 0. Documented workaround as well.
David
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Astle
To: IBM-MAIN
Sent: Sat, Aug 15, 2015 11:53
The only major change we had to do in my previous shop was to migrate from
BPX.DEFAULT.USER to BPX.UNIQUE.USER in order to migrate RACF AIM stage to 3.
This is very well described in the manual I've shown in my previous note.
If by easiest you mean least human activity, DFSMSdss can replace the HLQ as
part of a copy.
If by easiest you mean least CPU activity, then a simple CLIST or REXX you
invoke from a 3.4 dataset list might be suitable.
Neither approach will handle archived or tape datasets well. Both can
handle u
Hello Nathan,
You might want to take a look at "z/OS Migration - GA32-0889-04" manual =>
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/e0z3m104.pdf .
Other very helpful manuals can be found in the same IBM site:
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/v2r1pdf
Regards,
--
Check with your ISV vendors
Extremely valuable information provided by Marna Walle on migration to 2.1
Check the IBM site migration and installation planning manuals
Check for coexistence maintenance DB2, CICS, etc...
Rum SMPE FIXCAT reports
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 15, 2015, at 11:52 AM
Hi
We are upgrading our operating system from 1.13 to 2.1.
So apart from toleration maintenance are there any other Things to be
looked from the OS perspective?
Would somebody share the steps taken at your shop ?
Nathan
--
For
As a takeoff on this what is the easiest way to rename hlqold.*.** to
hlqnew.*.**
In most cases vsam files aren't in the mix.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
Original message
From: DanD
Date: 08/15/2015 9:58 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subje
Thanks Lizette.
The double * must be new (within the last 25 years :-) ).
Back in the day only a single * could be used to replace a single qualifier.
It was great for GDSs (ie. HLQ.GDGBASE.*).
Dan D
-Original Message-
From: Lizette Koehler
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 7:27 PM Newsgr
18 matches
Mail list logo
