What happenned to z/OS?

A Mac person accused me of being a Windows person and so I wanted to send them a link to "my" operating system. Imagine my surprise when I could not find it. http://www-03.ibm.com/software/products/en/atoz?pgel=lnav#W-Z Where's the link to z/OS? Charles

Re: IEAVAPE2/IEAVPSE2 another address space

Thank you My real name is Joseph Reichman And I have licensed copy of RD Sent from my iPhone On Oct 17, 2015, at 10:17 AM, Peter Relson wrote: >> Waiting for the likes of Pete Relson to chime in > > I tend not to chime in when a poster does not have the courtesy to the >

Re: What happenned to z/OS?

I know it's on the site (and yes I know I can't spell nor respond correctly to a spell-checker prompt). My question was where is the link on the "all IBM software products" page? No z/VSE or z/VM either. Lots of this and that *for z/OS*. Maybe no operating systems? Charles -Original

Re: What happened to z/OS?

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/ Thanks, Craig -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 18:08 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: What happenned to z/OS? A Mac person

Re: What happenned to z/OS?

Same place as AIX I guess... -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 4:08 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [IBM-MAIN] What happenned to z/OS? A Mac person accused me of

Re: What happenned to z/OS?

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/ -Original Message- From: Ron Hawkins [mailto:ronjhawk...@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 4:24 PM To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List' Subject: RE: [IBM-MAIN] What happenned to z/OS? Same place as AIX I

Re: IEAVAPE2/IEAVPSE2 another address space

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Peter Relson wrote: > >Waiting for the likes of Pete Relson to chime in > > I tend not to chime in when a poster does not have the courtesy to the > list subscribers of using their real name. > ​BTW, what is wrong with the name michaelbutz?

External):Re: Unicode services Red alert

Apologies. My previous reply had no "subject" but was about the Red alert. One of those things that I noticed, naturally, too late, right after "send". Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe /

Re: IEAVAPE2/IEAVPSE2 another address space

>Waiting for the likes of Pete Relson to chime in I tend not to chime in when a poster does not have the courtesy to the list subscribers of using their real name. Pause pauses *you*, as the reference clearly says. Regardless, that table row appears to be related to "waking up", so the words

Re: (External):Re: IBM

It does beg the question of who is looking out, software vulnerability-wise, for those who don’t have enough clout to review source code. As Barry mentions, there is no such thing as perfect code. There is a lot of trust out there I think, and not enough skepticism / push back in this area.

Re: (External):Re: IBM

And - I don’t mean to imply at all that most companies are willfully abusing that fact, just simply that most software is a black box. > On Oct 17, 2015, at 11:08 AM, Clark Morris wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 06:16:47 -0700 (PDT), in bit.listserv.ibm-main you >

Re: (External):Re: IBM

On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 06:16:47 -0700 (PDT), in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >The fact that IBM continues to issue integrity PTFs shows that their code is >not perfect when it comes to integrity and therefore security. Nobody's is. >So, it is possible, by a review of the code, that the

Re: (External):Re: IBM

I'm thinking they just want to improve on the copies of Hercules that has been freely available to them for years. Doesn't the EC require IBM to give the same sort of access to source code? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On