On 26 August 2016 at 12:27, Kirk Wolf wrote:
> EDC5241S Load request for fetch load module unsuccessful.
> errno2 = C407003B
>
>> bpxmtext C407003B
> JrEdcFtchFcfailed01: The program called fetch() to load a module. The load
> failed.
but...
On 26 August 2016 at 15:39, Jerry Callen wrote:
> JR
The CICS job has closed. New z/OS sysprog recently opened below. Sorry
figure $70K max, which sucks unless you're looking for a victory run with
low stress. Remote interview probable plus full-time TC too. Can't hurt
to apply. I'm not the hiring manager, just a sysprog. I could use the
help!
Hi Jake, Cherly,
looking at z13 data, SMF73CPD = '24', but that may be different on an EC12.
But, you can look at SMF73ACR (= 'IQD ')
John
john.ti...@intellimagic.com
On Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 3:20:54 PM UTC+2, Cheryl Watson wrote:
> Hi Jake,
>
>
>
> Look at the RMF type 73 (Monitor
We have a LE/C program that is using the fetch() library function to load a
module from a STEPLIB. In *some* environments this fails with:
EDC5241S Load request for fetch load module unsuccessful.
errno2 = C407003B
> bpxmtext C407003B
JrEdcFtchFcfailed01: The program called fetch() to load a mod
Hi Folks,
CBT Tape Version 492 has been cut, and the website www.cbttape.org
has been updated accordingly (I think).
Use it in good health and happiness.
Sincerely,Sam
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arch
Appears to have closed about a month ago.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Beaver [mailto:st...@stevebeaver.com]
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 11:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: FW: Job Search
Ken - Your pay rates top out at $80k. Most of us that contract are over $65/HR
W2,
Do any of you use the LPEX Editor under RD/z? I've used the ISPF editor since
it was invented, (well, at least 40+ years), and trying to change editors is
somewhat disconcerting (not to mention just out right frustrating).
I miss LABLES, (yes I know about bookmarks, but it's not the same).
Or it may just be doing a better job than V4 when determining code can never be
reached. :-)
Jorge, you really don't allow RC=4 to be considered a good compile? That seems
rather strict.
Frank
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Greg Shirey
Se
Ken - Your pay rates top out at $80k. Most of us that contract are over $65/HR
W2, not $40/HR W2
Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of scott
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 9:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
Jorge,
I believe the V4R2 version of the message was IGYOP3091W, which is also a
warning message and would have also generated an RC=04.
The compiler may be incorrectly indicating code has been discarded - see APAR
PI63119, for instance.
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Ori
Mr. Smith,
Do you have the posting for the z/OS position?
With respect,
Scott Vetter
svet...@ameritech.net
On 07/19/2016 08:57 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
My organization has just posted a CICS sysprog job (below). There's good
support for Telecommunting here and if you've got solid skills working
I'm sorry, I now see that you want to do it in batch. Can't help you there.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: 26 August, 2016 16:07
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
Subject: RE: WLM Question
If you just want to export and reload the definition: yes.
Kees,
You missed the *batch* aspect.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 10:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: WLM Question
If you just want to expo
If you just want to export and reload the definition: yes.
Click Files in the WLM application.
-Save As exports the Service Definition to a file.
-Open (or option 1 when starting the WLM application) reads the Service
Definition, so you can Install/Activate it.
Take care that WLM makes a private
It has been awhile since I have played with WLM. :)
Is there a way in batch to extract a WLM service definition and perform a
save/save as to a dataset that I can use for DR preprocessing purposes?
I am try to make sure we at least have one copy available at DR and this
process would be part
The message would occur with V4.2 with OPT of STD (or the not very much fuller
FULL).
Perhaps the message now comes from OPT(0)? You can check that.
Note, the message is correct. The best way to get rid of it is to fix the code
(as always) unless it is something which is supposed to be like th
I'd make a new PROC with COND=(8,LT) for subsequent steps.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ie
ab600/xexcond.htm
In a message dated 8/26/2016 1:56:18 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
jgarc...@mapfre.com writes:
We've just upgraded to Cobol V5R1 and in t
17 matches
Mail list logo
