Re: IEFUJV PROCESS OF JECL CARDS

2017-01-09 Thread bILHA ELROY
We have Os-em(Trident) that handles all our JES2 exits , and we cannot process the /* JOBPARM through Os-em , so we tought of handling it through the IEFUJV SMF exit. Mainly we want to validate various parameters. From the documentation we cant understand if its possible and if we have a an ima

Re: IEFUJV PROCESS OF JECL CARDS

2017-01-09 Thread John McKown
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 2:43 AM, bILHA ELROY wrote: > Z/OS V2.1 > > Is it possible to process JECL (/*JOBPARM for example) cards in IEFUJV > exit ? If so, can we change the card image (not only set a R.C ) > ​I don't see how. JECL is _NOT_ JCL! JECL cards are "control cards" which are interpreted

Re: IEFUJV PROCESS OF JECL CARDS

2017-01-09 Thread Lizette Koehler
You may wish to look at Easy/Exit by DTS Software http://www.dtssoftware.com/product_ext.htm It is a much easier way to maintain exits in z/OS (JES2, z/OS, HSM, etc...) Second is to contact Trident Services. They will sometimes make special changes to z/OSEM for customers. Let them know what y

Re: new JES2 MAS jobs will not run on member 2

2017-01-09 Thread Carmen Vitullo
Just wanted to thank everyone on the list for their insight to my issues with a new JES2MAS, especaiilly Lizzette, followed the doc to the letter, removed the old member first with a warm start MEMBER(2),NAME= once I responded to the JES2 WTOR are you sure, JES2 Initialized, I shutdown JES2 an

Re: IPLing z/OS 2.2 from 1.13 for first time getting JES2 catastrophic error

2017-01-09 Thread Pommier, Rex
Tom et al, We were off Friday afternoon so I didn't get your e-mail until this morning. I had the same thoughts over the weekend and messing with it this morning, I discovered the problem. I had neglected to use the ALLD and ALLE parameters in my DFDSS job to copy the spool and checkpoint vol

Re: COBOL5 and ceedump

2017-01-09 Thread Cameron Conacher
Hello everyone, Does anyone know if this APAR is available for COBOL 5.2 and if it is available for COBOL 6.1? I mean, would a specific APAR even be need for COBOL 6.1? Or would this APAR (PI65115) be part of the original 6.1 distribution? Thank you, ...Cameron On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 12:48 P

Re: COBOL5 and ceedump

2017-01-09 Thread Nims,Alva John (Al)
For APAR PI65115, it looks like a separate APAR PI68274, was opened for Cobol 6.1 If you look at the information page for PI65115: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PI65115 there is the line: APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following: UI39594 UI39595 UI39596 UI39597 PI682

AW: COBOL5 and ceedump

2017-01-09 Thread Roland Schiradin
Hi Cameron, check the APAR PI65115 for COBOL 5.2 Release 52H : UI39595 available 16/07/29 (F607 ) Release 520 : UI39594 available 16/07/29 (F607 ) Release 521 : UI39596 available 16/07/29 (F607 ) Release 522 : UI39597 available 16/07/29 (F607 ) And APAR Identifier .. PI

Re: [SURVEY] Who's using Java 8

2017-01-09 Thread Kirk Wolf
David, FYI, we recently updated our free z/OS port / packaging / enhancements to Apache Tomcat to include Tomcat 8, which requires Java 7. https://dovetail.com/products/tomcat.html Kirk Wolf Dovetailed Technologies http://dovetail.com On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:18 AM, David Crayford wrote: >

Re: COBOL5 and ceedump

2017-01-09 Thread Bill Woodger
The full "Fix list for Enterprise COBOL for z/OS" for V5+ is here: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27041164 This is segregated by compiler release/version and also includes the runtime (Language Environment). -

Re: IEFUJV PROCESS OF JECL CARDS

2017-01-09 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
One fallout from the advent of JES2 V1R7 several years ago was the proliferation of exits. V2R7 was the first release to support TCP/IP in addition to traditional SNA. To support both environments, IBM split exit processing into (generally) two analogous exits. You don't have to support both en

Re: IEFUJV PROCESS OF JECL CARDS

2017-01-09 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
One fallout from the advent of JES2 V2R7 several years ago was the proliferation of exits. V2R7 was the first release to support TCP/IP in addition to traditional SNA. To support both environments, IBM split exit processing into (generally) two analogous exits. You don't have to support both e

KC: www-03.ibm.com vs. www.ibm.com

2017-01-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
I notice that many Knowledge Center pages are at server www-03.ibm.com. E.g: http://http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv//systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/ ... but if I excise the "-03": http://http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv//systems/z/os/zos/library/

KC: www-03.ibm.com vs. www.ibm.com

2017-01-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
(Trying again; trying not to fumble the links this time.) I notice that many Knowledge Center pages are at server www-03.ibm.com. E.g: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/ ... but if I excise the "-03": http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/ ... it promptl

Re: KC: www-03.ibm.com vs. www.ibm.com

2017-01-09 Thread zMan
I think that it's always on www-03, just that the front-end server is smart enough to redirect. As for problems caused by bookmarking--IBM can't keep their own links working within the site, so you might as well bookmark things when you find them, but expect the links to break without notice. On M

Re: A dressing Question

2017-01-09 Thread scott Ford
I like Caesar On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:11 PM John McKown wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Chris Hoelscher > > wrote: > > > > > I prefer thousand island > > > > > > > ​With the proper stuffing, I prefer LBD.​ > > > > > > > > > > > > Chris Hoelscher > > > Technology Architect, Databas

Re: IPLing z/OS 2.2 from 1.13 for first time getting JES2 catastrophic error

2017-01-09 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Pommier, Rex wrote: >I had the same thoughts over the weekend and messing with it this morning, I >discovered the problem. I had neglected to use the ALLD and ALLE parameters >in my DFDSS job to copy the spool and checkpoint volumes. So DFDSS dutifully >copied the pointers to "empty" datasets

AW: Re: COBOL5 and ceedump

2017-01-09 Thread Peter Hunkeler
>For APAR PI65115, it looks like a separate APAR PI68274, was opened for Cobol >6.1 >If you look at the information page for PI65115: >http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PI65115 Out of interest I had a look at what this is all about, and I must admit I'm baffled. What does that

Re: AW: Re: COBOL5 and ceedump

2017-01-09 Thread Bill Woodger
Unfortunately an old technique was still in use, and hit many clients. See here for some detail: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/forums/html/topic?id=c476d2c9-0d4e-4073-97c5-6384d8f381c0&ps=25 -- For IBM-MAIN subscr

Re: AW: Re: COBOL5 and ceedump

2017-01-09 Thread Bill Woodger
See also here, where a policy-shift was revealed (towards the end of the thread) to consider replicating V4 results where reasonable. https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/forums/html/topic?id=0f54483b-6f83-441d-a5fc-22a3d333dddf&ps=25 Ironically this has included deliberate replication o