Yep!
Thanks,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Blaicher, Christopher Y.
Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 3:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEAVAPE return code doc wrong?
Go with the IEAASM
Go with the IEAASM definitions. Open a doc PMR.
Chris Blaicher
Technical Architect
Mainframe Development
P: 201-930-8234 | M: 512-627-3803
E: cblaic...@syncsort.com
Syncsort Incorporated
2 Blue Hill Plaza #1563
Pearl River, NY 10965
www.syncsort.com
Data quality leader Trillium Software is
I'm looking at
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.ie
aa200/eaa9ape.htm return codes (decimal) 40, 44 and 48. The equate names do
not seem to go with the "Meaning."
In fact, as I look at little further, the symbol names do not correspond to
their values in
I don't need any optional adventures in debugging. I have 16 bytes to spare;
not sure I have much hair to spare.
I just thought that perhaps someone might say "yeah, we do it all the time," or
that Peter or Jim might know.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
I am in the process of building JCL to distribute resources across several
images. I've been leveraging 'SYMBOLS=' in JCL to assist in that capacity.
I've now come to a point where some conditional processing takes place, and
I am using IDCAMS IF-THEN logic to determine whether to ALTER - NEWNAME
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 19:22:55 +, Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA) wrote:
>I've received a number of PDF's from different sales organizations and
>publishers - each one is formatted for a printing.
>
>1. I am not going to print the file to read it
>2. I am going to read it on my workstation
I can really only echo what Chris Blaicher said. Setting up multiple
DUs (TCBs and SRBs) with their own PEs, and managing the PETs can be a
mind-bending experience. I can't say why you can't use the same field
for the updated token, but I strongly suspect you cannot. It's been
more than a year
I've received a number of PDF's from different sales organizations and
publishers - each one is formatted for a printing.
1. I am not going to print the file to read it
2. I am going to read it on my workstation monitor
3. My workstation monitor is NOT in vertical page format
It was a while ago when I wrote a bunch of code using pause elements, but as I
remember having those the same was not good. It may have been because I was
using XFR.
PAUSE/RELEASE and XFER are great services, a bear to get setup and get right,
but 4 years and probably trillions of uses later,
no real definition except its defined as special because it was defined in
another CSS
Defining a special device (3390S)
A device is considered special if it is defined in the alternate subchannel
set. In HCD panels, a special device is shown as device type "3390S".
Observe the following
For IEAVPSE, can pause_element_token and updated_pause_element_token both be
the same field? I don't see much use for the old pause_element_token after
IEAVPSE completes.
Charles
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
>I believe it was 4.1. Here's an interesting article:
>>>http://2000clicks.com/links/Computers/IBMMainframeHistory/mvshist5.htm
Indeed. Thanks for the link.
-- Peter Hunkeler
-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
W dniu 2017-10-04 o 15:25, Peter Hunkeler pisze:
I do remember that MVS/ESA V5 (V5.1) introduced the *parallel* sysplex. But I
don't remember exactly what MVS/ESA release introduced the *basic* sysplex.
ISTR, it was MVS/ESA V4 (V4.1). Correct?
Yes, it was a version 4.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
I believe it was 4.1. Here's an interesting article:
http://2000clicks.com/links/Computers/IBMMainframeHistory/mvshist5.htm
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2017 9:26 AM
I do remember that MVS/ESA V5 (V5.1) introduced the *parallel* sysplex. But I
don't remember exactly what MVS/ESA release introduced the *basic* sysplex.
ISTR, it was MVS/ESA V4 (V4.1). Correct?
--
Peter Hunkeler
--
For
There are 2 quite new types of devices eligible for Subchannel Set 1,2,3
That means 3390D which is "PPRC secondary" and 3390S whis is
Q1: What is the purpose of 3390S device?
Q2: What about 3390D when changed its role from PPRC secondary to
primary device? Can it be varied online and used
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 00:49:30 -0400, Edward Finnell wrote:
>
>If we had more info on the problem better suggestions could be provided. One
>of the old tricks was to preallocate sortwks and pass them thru the life of
>the job. No need to worry about vol=ref
>
Temporary data sets are a major
000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Edward Finnell) writes:
> For decades MVS has honored the concept of public, Storage and private
> DASD. Numerous SHARE papers on how to configure DASD subsystems in
> order to reduce contention and optimize thruput. WSC under Ray Wicks
> produced
18 matches
Mail list logo
