Don't know what the interfaces will be but the research is pretty amazing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjD1aLm4Thg
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
If this is a physical tape, and you can "hand it" to the operator, you might
try label=(2,nl),expdt=98000 and give it a dummy volume serial number.
Thanks
Bill Bishop
Consultant, Mainframe Engineer
Mainframe and Scheduling | Infrastructure Technology Services
Toyota Motor North America
Hi,
Has anyone tried running TAPEMAP (and coding BLP)?
(CBT File 299 or 171).
Regards,
David
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
On 12/20/2018 2:36 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
By way of update, after studying everyone's suggestions, I ran the job with
this DD:
//TAPEIN DD UNIT=(TAPECR,,DEFER),
// LABEL=(EXPDT=98000),
// VOL=SER=(nn),
// DISP=(OLD,KEEP)
and got pretty much the same result:
IEF403I TAPEANAL
By way of update, after studying everyone's suggestions, I ran the job with
this DD:
//TAPEIN DD UNIT=(TAPECR,,DEFER),
// LABEL=(EXPDT=98000),
// VOL=SER=(nn),
// DISP=(OLD,KEEP)
and got pretty much the same result:
IEF403I
All this agita over invoking a straightforward system service routine like
IGGCSI00 argues strongly for an IBM-supplied and IBM supported "thunk" or
"glue" subroutine to enable such services to be used from AMODE64 programs.
Or even for an alternate AMODE64 environment from XPLINK, which
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:17:12 -0500, Pierre Fichaud wrote:
>You can get around stack processing in 31-bit mode by using #pragma
>linkage(fred,OS) where fred is a non-LE module. I've done this often.
I haven't used #pragma linkage(fred,OS), but I have used
extern "OS_NOSTACK" {int fred(void);}
in
From another thread:
> Many of these techniques have been documented in the IBM Journal of Research
> and Development.
> Unfortunately, a few years ago IBM decided to hide that behind a paywall.
This has always seemed to me like a colossal marketing failure. There is just
no better showcase
Tom,
If fetch is hard-wired to refuse a load of a 31-bit module while
running in 64-bit mode, I need to write a 64-bit assembler front-end module.
You can get around stack processing in 31-bit mode by using #pragma
linkage(fred,OS) where fred is a non-LE module. I've done this often.
IIRC, there is some RACF work needed to support BLP.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 3:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Dancing around RMM
We want to discard some very old tapes after
Excellent answer. 100% correct. 0% usable.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2018-12-18 o 19:18, Seymour J Metz pisze:
Like many other questions, the answer depends on which processor you're asking
about and what options have been set.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
11 matches
Mail list logo