NeurIPs Keynote 2018

2018-12-20 Thread Edward Finnell
Don't know what the interfaces will be but the research is pretty amazing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjD1aLm4Thg -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu

Re: Dancing around RMM

2018-12-20 Thread Bill Bishop (TMNA)
If this is a physical tape, and you can "hand it" to the operator, you might try label=(2,nl),expdt=98000 and give it a dummy volume serial number. Thanks Bill Bishop Consultant, Mainframe Engineer Mainframe and Scheduling | Infrastructure Technology Services Toyota Motor North America

Dancing around RMM

2018-12-20 Thread David Spiegel
Hi, Has anyone tried running TAPEMAP (and coding BLP)? (CBT File 299 or 171). Regards, David -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO

Re: Dancing around RMM

2018-12-20 Thread Tom Conley
On 12/20/2018 2:36 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: By way of update, after studying everyone's suggestions, I ran the job with this DD: //TAPEIN DD UNIT=(TAPECR,,DEFER), // LABEL=(EXPDT=98000), // VOL=SER=(nn), // DISP=(OLD,KEEP) and got pretty much the same result: IEF403I TAPEANAL

Re: Dancing around RMM

2018-12-20 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
By way of update, after studying everyone's suggestions, I ran the job with this DD: //TAPEIN DD UNIT=(TAPECR,,DEFER), // LABEL=(EXPDT=98000), // VOL=SER=(nn), // DISP=(OLD,KEEP) and got pretty much the same result: IEF403I

Re: 64-bit C code fetching IGGCSI00

2018-12-20 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
All this agita over invoking a straightforward system service routine like IGGCSI00 argues strongly for an IBM-supplied and IBM supported "thunk" or "glue" subroutine to enable such services to be used from AMODE64 programs. Or even for an alternate AMODE64 environment from XPLINK, which

Re: 64-bit C code fetching IGGCSI00

2018-12-20 Thread Tom Marchant
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:17:12 -0500, Pierre Fichaud wrote: >You can get around stack processing in 31-bit mode by using #pragma >linkage(fred,OS) where fred is a non-LE module. I've done this often. I haven't used #pragma linkage(fred,OS), but I have used extern "OS_NOSTACK" {int fred(void);} in

Bring back the IBM Journal of R!

2018-12-20 Thread Jerry Callen
From another thread: > Many of these techniques have been documented in the IBM Journal of Research > and Development. > Unfortunately, a few years ago IBM decided to hide that behind a paywall. This has always seemed to me like a colossal marketing failure. There is just no better showcase

Re: 64-bit C code fetching IGGCSI00

2018-12-20 Thread Pierre Fichaud
Tom, If fetch is hard-wired to refuse a load of a 31-bit module while running in 64-bit mode, I need to write a 64-bit assembler front-end module. You can get around stack processing in 31-bit mode by using #pragma linkage(fred,OS) where fred is a non-LE module. I've done this often.

Re: Dancing around RMM

2018-12-20 Thread Allan Staller
IIRC, there is some RACF work needed to support BLP. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 3:54 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Dancing around RMM We want to discard some very old tapes after

Re: Dummy query on processor failover

2018-12-20 Thread R.S.
Excellent answer. 100% correct. 0% usable. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland W dniu 2018-12-18 o 19:18, Seymour J Metz pisze: Like many other questions, the answer depends on which processor you're asking about and what options have been set. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz