Hi Skip,
Thanks for sharing your learnings, I do remember reading a similar post on the
same topics a few months ago here. I'm going cross-eyed trying to decipher
what's already here (to figure out the pattern used) rather than setting up
CTCs anew. So in that regard, I thought a REXX or someth
So what would this type of parms look like for LE at 4.2, do you use the FMID
of zos or part/all of LE?
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the mes
I can't help with the specific question posted, but on this list we often try
to help with OP's driving problem. Which in this case seems to be: how to
manage a complex CTC configuration? We've managed a complex CTC config since
the mid-90s without ever consulting diagrams. The secret sauce is h
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 15:22:33 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>AFAIK it won't reset the dirty bit. It does isolate AC(0) from AC(1).
Yes, it will, for that isolated parallel environment.
--
Walt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signof
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:51:23 +0200, Steff Gladstone
wrote:
>Do I understand correctly that TSOEXEC CALL creates a new subtask
>environment which is "insulated" from the goings-on in the mother task?
Yes. The parallel environment established by TSO/E via TSOEXEC would be clean,
even if the orig
Thanks, I noticed that immediately after sending the post :)
I had first typed "Action Keys" but changed it to "AID codes" right
before sending because I thought the first phrase would need more
explaining. Oops.
And don't call me surely.
On 2/21/2019 8:19 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
AID code
> AID codes are passed to the host when you press a key such as Enter,
> Clear, PF keys,
So far, so good.
> and of course
Two out of three.
> PA1/PA2/Attn.
Shirley you know better. ATTN is carried in an expedited flow SIGNAL and has no
AID.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.e
No such plans. CICS/IMS have the same issue as z/OS. Multiple SMPE
environments to support for each "product" (4 separate environments for 4 IMS
& related products).
CICS/IMS will remain separate from z/OS and related products.
z/OS and related products will be consolidated from multiple SMPE
My $0.02:
Global zone can have it all, but my opinion would be, to use separate
Target/DLib zones. Use ZONEINDEX to tie it all together.
Al Nims
Systems Admin/Programmer III
UF Information Technology
720 Bld. 3rd Floor, #9
P.O. Box 112050
Gainesville, FL. 32611
(e) ajn...@ufl.edu
(p) (352) 273-
> So the state of the keyboard locked/unlocked is different in your 2 cases.
> Lots of configuration options will cause this difference, but it has
> nothing to do with data streams constructed by the TN3270E emulator.
If the TH3270 client sends an ATTN, the behavior of ISPF will be different.
Do
Unlike, e.g., Enter, PA*, PF*, the SNA ATTN key generates an expedited flow RU,
which is not affected by keyboard locks. That's why ISPF can see it even with
lengthy processing.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainfram
I would expect that you are more likely to have the authorization for CONSOLE
than for SDSF.
Nit: you don't need the || when you abut a quoted string with a variable. IMHO
it's easier to read without.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
___
> Perhaps your friend's logmode specifies bi-sync (non-SNA) protocols?
Bisync is highly unlikely; local non-SNA is much more common.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Ed
Jaffe
Sen
Case is irrelevant: $T is not a TSO command or subcommand, and it doesn't have
the syntax of one..
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
ITschak Mugzach
Sent: Wednesday, February 20,
> Not SREL
?
How are you going to put, e.g., MVS and CICS, in the same zone?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Allan Staller
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 10:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN
Attention is not an AID key. An AID is carried in normal flow but an attention
is carried in expedited flow.
The word attention has different meanings depending on context:
1. What you terminal program means
2. What it means for SNA, in particular for an SNA 3270
3. What it means for TSO"
D
As an example, I have (inherited) a separate SMP/E zone for AO, Netview, JAVA
and many others.
These will all be consolidated with the new order.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Marchant
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 9:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LIST
Not SREL. Various compenents were installed in their own SMP environments
(SMPE/Target/Dlib).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 9:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4
How are you goin
IMHO the first step should always be a trace to see what the terminal actually
sent.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Alan(GMAIL)Watthey
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 6:39 A
AFAIK it won't reset the dirty bit. It does isolate AC(0) from AC(1).
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Steff Gladstone
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 8:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LIST
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:01:13 +, Allan Staller wrote:
>For historical reasons, I have several SMP/E zones associated w/zOS and other
>ServerPac available items.
>I am going to consolidate all of the separate zones associated into a single
>zone to simplify the maintenance process.
Do you mea
Because if they give it a new name or a new version then it's a new license,
with terms that may not be what you're used to.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Beverly Caldwell
Sen
How are you going to consolidate zones with different SREL?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Allan Staller
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 9:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
S
Agreed, I know that. The question is will z/OS 2.4 be supported on my available
hardware.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 2:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4
You
For historical reasons, I have several SMP/E zones associated w/zOS and other
ServerPac available items.
I am going to consolidate all of the separate zones associated into a single
zone to simplify the maintenance process.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behal
Thomas Ambrous wrote:
>Are there alternatives to either of these arrangements that allows a
customer
>to support production processing capacity in two sites without incurring
the
>extra cost of CMP, or even the CBU?
Yes, potentially, but backing up half a step, CBU (Capacity Backup) is a
terrific
You CAN migrate 2.2 -> 2.4 (= skip 1 version). That is what we are planning.
Kees
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Allan Staller
> Sent: 20 February, 2019 18:38
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: z/OS 2.
Thomas,
CMP simplifies IBM license accounting. It avoids adding the peak of both sites
in one month, which resulted in double costs, that (as we did) should be
negotiated and argumented with IBM on each occurrence.
We also made some financial savings with CMP, but that could well be because of
28 matches
Mail list logo
