Hi,
The reason goes back a few decades, way before my time.
In the beginning, when we needed to print Hebrew, the Hebrew characters
replaced English Upper case. This was before there were even terminals.
In the next stage, Hebrew Characters replaced the English lower case letters,
so we could pri
"Why do you need to know?" is an interesting question. Don't forget IPv6,
by the way.
There's also the fact that the local answer(s) to that question ("What's my
IP address?") aren't(isn't) necessarily or even very often the non-local
answer(s). Network Address Translation (NAT), proxies, VLANs, V
Gadi Ben-Avi wrote:
>I found a solution. There is an optional FMID you can download
>and install called JIF7R16 that adds libraries with upper case
>only versions of the panels, messages and some other libraries.
This FMID is intended to address the needs and/or preferences of some z/OS
customers
Gadi Ben-Avi wrote:
>I would like to prevent a user from accessing the SMF log
>streams
>Is there anything else that I need to define?
To add to earlier replies, it's prudent to encrypt your log stream data
sets so that you're fully blocking unauthorized user access, even from
storage administ
Stan,
There's a big difference between an IP address of the current stack and a
usable IP address of the current stack. It would not be much use giving an IP
address of, say, a hipersocket interface home address which is not routable.
Although you can find out all the home addresses (there ha
Hi Folks,
CBT Version 497 is now available on www.cbttape.org. Over 60 files
changed. (They were available on Updates before.) Use it well...
All the best of everything to all of you.
Sincerely, Sam
--
For I
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:10 AM Stan Weyman <
0239b6933cab-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>Is there an accessible control block that holds the IP address (or
> addresses) for the current LPAR I'm running on? I have need to pass back
> this address to another remote application and
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 08:16:20 +0800, Peter Van Dyke wrote:
>If you have a copybook that maps the records you want to generate then IBM
>File Manager can be used to generate random date values. You could use the
>copybook with the File Manager "Data Create Utility":
>
>https://www.ibm.com/support/kn
If you have a copybook that maps the records you want to generate then IBM
File Manager can be used to generate random date values. You could use the
copybook with the File Manager "Data Create Utility":
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSXJAV_14.1.0/com.ibm.filemanager.doc_14.1/base
This win the award for best answer
Joe Reichman
170-10 73 rd ave
Fresh meadows NY 11366
> On Apr 29, 2019, at 5:58 PM, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
> wrote:
>
> I think one option to tackle this is to have two DD statements. One will be
> used to read the directory. The other can specify QSAM a
I don’t think so I do find to get the right sysadata member then why cannt i do
get afterwards and have DFSMS deblock
It for me
> On Apr 29, 2019, at 5:08 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> The MACRF for BPAM is perfectly reasonable. A better question might be why
> IBM chose to not implement
Fair point. Answer is, I learnt this stuff before they invented DESERV.
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw | Security Lead | RSM Partners Ltd
Web: www.rsmpartners.com
'Dance like no one is watching. Encrypt like everyone is.'
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On B
> First you open the directory and read and decode the blocks to get the member
> names.
Why not just us DESERV?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
Sent: Mo
I think one option to tackle this is to have two DD statements. One will be
used to read the directory. The other can specify QSAM and can read and process
the member using GET and PUTX. (If a member is to be written that is longer
than its previous version then you may wish to use a third QSAM
Not worried about the efficiency of compression. The issue is showing to
someone the CPU saved by using zEDC instead of SMS compression. IBM's zBNA
tool estimates it, and we may just use that, but I was hoping someone had a way
to measure the CPU used just for SMS compression in a job, without
If he has a TCP session with the remote application then it already has the IP
address and port. I'm not sure what the OP is trying to ask.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tim
Ha
The LPAR may have multiple IP addresses; what you need is the IP address for
your end of the session. But why doesn't the remote application get that
automatically? In fact, how does it communicate with you at all without it?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
___
Using a single allocate and a single OPEN is far more efficient. Unfortunately,
REXX doesn't support that, although you could write a REXX function package for
the I/O.
If you're processing all of the members, you can use DESERVE to read the BLDL
(SMDE) data for all of the members and avoid t
That's certainly the supported approach.
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3/source/STOWBLDL.ASM was my home grown alternative.
Others have use EXCP, lthoughI don't know whether they achieved the performance
of SAM-E.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
_
The MACRF for BPAM is perfectly reasonable. A better question might be why IBM
chose to not implement QPAM, or better yet, VPAM a la TSS/360.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Jose
Success! We did the first 50+% this weekend (non-prod) in a little over four
hours total. Forewent any compare utility as a costly and time consuming
process of dubious value. Planning on the same strategy for the prod farm in
the next month or so. Thanks to all who contributed.
.
.
J.O.Skip R
Hi All
IBM Library Server uses the IBM Publications Center as it's source. The
Publications Center (aka publib) and it's content is NOT going away. You can
download all the content (BookManager Books, PDFs, Shelves and Extended
Shelves) using the IBM Softcopy Librarian or you can use the IBM
If IPv4 only, just do an INITAPI, GETHOSTID, TERMAPI. This will return
the primary address of the TCP/IP stack that your job is associated with.
But, if you already have a connection to another host, that host can get
your address easily.
Tony Thigpen
Stan Weyman wrote on 4/29/19 8:00 AM:
A valid question is "what is the IP address of 'me'?" What is the (an!) IP
address of the host that I am currently running on?
Independent of any remote hosts or connections.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:32:34 -0500, Tim Hare
wrote:
>Yes, I've looked at Scott Barry's presentation. It tells me a lot of good
>info about zEDC measurements, and it does document compression information in
>type 14/15 but it appears as though IBM didn't provide any measurement of CPU
>used
These may be dumb questions but:
1) I'm assuming you connected to the remote application first? Else how could
it connect without the IP address somehow?
2) Why isn't the remote application content with the host/domain name (since IP
addresses _can_ change)?
3) Why isn't the remote applicatio
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:49:25 -0500, Tim Hare wrote:
>These are all good questions - in this instance I don't know the internals of
>the product that might be creating these long names. It's a 'developer
>studio' type of product which runs on Windows and communicates to a started
>task from th
You can do this with ISPF in batch, and Rexx. I've used this when I had to
change the one thing in hundreds of PDS members. Of course you have to balance
your development and debugging time versus just doing repetitive edits via
RCHANGE (PF6)
To invoke ISPF in batch. Note BDISPMAX ver
These are all good questions - in this instance I don't know the internals of
the product that might be creating these long names. It's a 'developer
studio' type of product which runs on Windows and communicates to a started
task from the same vendor which can also run on other platforms such
Query for article on testing mainframe systems, applications, networks
This is for website/magazine I'd not seen before: https://increment.com/
It's described: Increment is a print and digital magazine about how
teams build and operate software systems at scale.
It has an interesting approach, d
Yes, I've looked at Scott Barry's presentation. It tells me a lot of good info
about zEDC measurements, and it does document compression information in type
14/15 but it appears as though IBM didn't provide any measurement of CPU used
by SMS compression. I guess the fallback is to try to run
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 09:00:10 -0700, Tom Brennan wrote:
>Just wondering... Is the reason for this because upper case may be
>easier to read for folks who's first language is something other than
>English?
>
It could be worse than that. For example:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/
Upper case may be fine - until anyone needs to work with USS directories or
files through ISPF 3.17 or similar.
Mike Wawiorko
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.
Just wondering... Is the reason for this because upper case may be
easier to read for folks who's first language is something other than
English?
On 4/28/2019 10:43 PM, Gadi Ben-Avi wrote:
I found a solution.
There is an optional FMID you can download and install called JIF7R16 that adds
libr
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 08:28:22 -0400 Joseph Reichman
wrote:
:>I have to process a DSORG type dataset processing each member
:>I initially do a FIND and go through Each member
:>Seems lime with this access method I have to use READ instead of GET
:>And thus do my own deb locking processing In R
What i usuaaly do is running ispf search utility on the the pds where the
seach key is a blank. It is later easy to process using rexxx. Btw, you
don't need ispf to run the utility and it can be part of your rexx (as i
do).
ITschak
בתאריך יום ב׳, 29 באפר׳ 2019, 16:14, מאת Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM
The name of the stack is the first parameter to EZBNMIFR!
Robin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
Sent: 29 April 2019 20:08
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TCPIP IP address for cu
Its all complex why did IBM have to have MACRF=R with DSORG=PO was there any
good reason ?
I would have add another step truth is I want to keep track of the members as
they represent the CSECTS wonder if anyone submitted a RFE for this ever
> On Apr 29, 2019, at 9:13 AM, Vernooij, Kees (IT
Already considered this and whichever method used will have to deal with the
potential where more than one stack is run. Thanks for the input Kees
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 9:
A different approach is unloading the PDS and process the flat file with Rexx.
Or if you have SAS, run PROC SOURCE and process the sequential file, either
with SAS of Rexx.
Kees.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of
"it will tell you pretty much everything about *the* TCP/IP stack":
What if you have more than 1 TCP/IP stack in your system?
Which one does the application intend to use and how does the NMI address that
stack?
Kees
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IB
Thanks for the suggestion John.This or the NMI interface suggested by
Robin should work. Regards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
John McKown
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 8:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TCPIP IP address for
Thanks for pointing me to the NMI Robin. Regards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Robin Atwood
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 8:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TCPIP IP address for current LPAR
The EZBNMIFR Network Management Interf
Thanks don’t think there is a easy way out
I am running the code under IKJEFT01 in background as a batch job I need to
process all the members Actually it is the SYSADATA file a VB PO I have to read
the ADATA for each member doesn’t seem like any easy way out
Thanks
> On Apr 29, 2019, at 8
The EZBNMIFR Network Management Interface will probably be of help here, it
will tell you pretty much everything about the TCP/IP stack.
Robin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Stan Weyman
Sent: 29 April 2019 19:00
To:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:10 AM Stan Weyman <
0239b6933cab-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>Is there an accessible control block that holds the IP address (or
> addresses) for the current LPAR I'm running on? I have need to pass back
> this address to another remote application and
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:28 AM Joseph Reichman
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have to process a DSORG type dataset processing each member
>
> I initially do a FIND and go through Each member
>
> Seems lime with this access method I have to use READ instead of GET
>
> And thus do my own deb locking processing
Hi
I have to process a DSORG type dataset processing each member
I initially do a FIND and go through Each member
Seems lime with this access method I have to use READ instead of GET
And thus do my own deb locking processing In Rexx I would do the allocate and
unallocate and this would use Q
Is there an accessible control block that holds the IP address (or
addresses) for the current LPAR I'm running on? I have need to pass back this
address to another remote application and would prefer to interrogate a control
block rather than issue commands to obtain same a la D TCPIP,,NETS
Probably
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
David Spiegel
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 11:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Access to SMF logstreams
Hi Gadi,
I think that you meant "discrete" instead of "discreet".
Shalom,
David
On 2019-0
Hi Gadi,
I think that you meant "discrete" instead of "discreet".
Shalom,
David
On 2019-04-29 01:34, Gadi Ben-Avi wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to prevent a user from accessing the SMF log streams.
> Class is active and there are discreet profiles for each of the SMF
> logstreams.
> The user in qu
51 matches
Mail list logo
