OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-04 Thread Bob Bridges
Technically the 55mph limit wasn't a federal law; Rex is right that speed limits are set and enforced by each state. But in the '70s Congress (the Federal Congress) passed a law that Federal highway money would not be forthcoming to states that allowed their speed limits to exceed 55mph. Most

Re: RMM Scratch Processing

2020-08-04 Thread Mark Jacobs
This is all I'm getting, nothing else. EDG6202E FAILURE DURING DFSMSrmm SUBSYSTEM PROCESSING EDG6901I UTILITY EDGHSKP COMPLETED WITH RETURN CODE 12 Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@prot

Re: RMM Scratch Processing

2020-08-04 Thread Gibney, Dave
And the msg error is? > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > Behalf Of Mark Jacobs > Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2020 6:22 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: RMM Scratch Processing > > Yea. I've looked at that manual, found the job. Ran it, failed wit

Re: RMM Scratch Processing

2020-08-04 Thread Mark Jacobs
Yea. I've looked at that manual, found the job. Ran it, failed without giving me any meaningful information. Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐

Re: RMM Scratch Processing

2020-08-04 Thread Roger Lowe
On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:10:43 +, Mark Jacobs wrote: >I know next to nothing about RMM, and need to mark some tapes in its database >as scratch, I have one tape (might be others too) that are in USER status and >its expdt has passed. I know that "something" needs to be done to make it a >scr

Re: HSM Query CDS Command Using ODS

2020-08-04 Thread Sri h Kolusu
Jasi, Query command does NOT support ODS. If you are running in batch then the output will be directed to SYSTSPRT dd. so try this //STEP0100 EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01 //SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=* //SYSTSIN DD * your QUERY command /* Kolusu --

HSM Query CDS Command Using ODS

2020-08-04 Thread Jasi Grewal
Hi, This might be an old news but was wondering if anyone has found a solution to HSEND Query CDS Command as it uses TPUT and displays on the screen instead of using ODS option. Our Site requires this information to measure the performance of the HSM Datasets on daily basis and is using OPS/M

Re: DFHSM APIs in a multi-vendor world

2020-08-04 Thread Marjory Montgomery
Hi Kirk, I'm a little late to your question. CA Disk doesn't have any commands to delete migrated(archived) data set records if that's what you were looking for. Do you need to delete the catalog entry and/or the records for it?I'm concerned that deleting either could be a problem if c

RMM Scratch Processing

2020-08-04 Thread Mark Jacobs
I know next to nothing about RMM, and need to mark some tapes in its database as scratch, I have one tape (might be others too) that are in USER status and its expdt has passed. I know that "something" needs to be done to make it a scratch tape, but everything I've tried has failed. Can someone

Re: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-04 Thread Roger W Suhr
There hasn’t been a general speed limit of 55 Mph(80 km/h) on US Interstate Highways in many years.  It’s 55 Mph only in populate areas (not many adhere to that anyway), 65 Mph outside the cities, and West of the Mississippi 75 Mph (or more in selected areas). I’ve seen 75 Mph East of the Mississip

Re: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-04 Thread John McKown
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:23 AM R.S. wrote: > (I know it's off-topic) > My opinion: I like american cars and roads. > However I don't understand common speed limit 55 mph which is in my > opinion too low for the road on desert. > Pretty much "inertia". Back when 55 was first introduced, it during

Re: [External] Re: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-04 Thread David Spiegel
Hi Rex, In the Northeast, interstates are generally 55-70. I haven't encountered any interstate that is 80. There can also be sections of the same highway with differing speeds. Regards, David On 2020-08-04 09:01, Pommier, Rex wrote: Radoslaw, Speed limits are different in the States based

Re: [External] Re: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-04 Thread Tony Thigpen
The 55 MPH limit was a federal law designed to force people to save fuel by driving slower during the 70's when the fuel crisis hit the US. And, we were stuck with for a long time even after the fuel crisis was over. Some studies showed that while it saved fuel for autos, it cost fuel for long-

Re: [External] Re: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-04 Thread Pommier, Rex
Radoslaw, Speed limits are different in the States based on which state you're in. Each state can set its own speed limit. I am in South Dakota, and most smaller 2 lane roads are 55 MPH. Many of the state 2 lane roads are 65, and the interstates have an 80 MPH speed limit, the equivalent of

Re: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-04 Thread R.S.
(I know it's off-topic) My opinion: I like american cars and roads. However I don't understand common speed limit 55 mph which is in my opinion too low for the road on desert. BTW: Here in Poland default limit on highway is 140 km/h. However in Germany default is ...your sanity. No speed limit.

Re: Goodbye.

2020-08-04 Thread אריאל מרשנד
Wow - All the best and better. ☺ I am a passive member of the group but I read many of your Posts. Thank you very much and more ! Be Happy and enjoy your next steps.🐦🐦🐦 On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 10:45, Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM < kees.verno...@klm.com> wrote: > After more than 41 years working a

Re: SRB routine return code

2020-08-04 Thread Joseph Reichman
The SRB is in common so I still have addressability to the storage when it returns. As far as using dataspace the program processing it is in Metal C. I found it easier to work with alet than running AMODE 64 Thanks > On Aug 4, 2020, at 7:56 AM, Rob Scott wrote: > > What is stopping you fro

Re: SRB routine return code

2020-08-04 Thread Rob Scott
What is stopping you from using the reason code from the SRB? For example : SRB RC=x’0008’ SRB RSN=x’0801’Dataspace create failed SRB RSN=x’0802’ ALESERV failed SRB RSN=X’0803’ etc etc If you are after more diagnostic fields (eg the *actual* RC from an IBM service) t

Re: Goodbye.

2020-08-04 Thread David Crayford
Please lurk! You were a fantastic contributor to this forum! Best of luck with your retirement. On 2020-08-03 3:44 PM, Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM wrote: After more than 41 years working as a mainframe systems programmer, the time has come for me to say goodbye. I enjoyed the mainframe worl

Re: SRB routine return code

2020-08-04 Thread Joseph Reichman
Thats what I was trying to say if something went wrong from a z/os point of view SYNCOMPADDR would contain a return code SYNCRSNADDR would be the reason code As an example I am creating a dataspace in the target address space if that fails and I would like to let the invoker of the IEAMSCHED

Re: Anybody still running a 3270 setup?

2020-08-04 Thread Seymour J Metz
Doesn't the 3290 require a DSL? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Dave Wade [dave.g4...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 3:33 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTS

Re: SRB routine return code

2020-08-04 Thread Rob Scott
Joseph I am not sure what you are asking as your question seemed slightly garbled, however the following might help : IEAMSCHD has a variety of return and reason code fields, including getting feedback from the dispatch and the scheduling of the SRB. Considering the following : WA_DISPATCH_RC

Re: Anybody still running a 3270 setup?

2020-08-04 Thread Dave Wade
>Hi > >Question about 3270, once again. >As you might know, interest in 3270 hardware increased recently, due to >the emerge of Andrew Kay's oec[0,1]. >I have built the required hardware in order to be able to talk to the >3290 display that I have. Unfortunately this is a DFT terminal that is >c