On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 18:32:56 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>I have used it extensively. It is way better than nothing but it has some
>severe limitations.
>
>Also it is only DSECT to C struct. The OP was looking for, and I am interested
>in, any to any.
>
*If* you control the assembler source sour
What would also be useful is a next/previous button at the top right & bottom
right of each Doc page.
2 places because for pages that are long, one doesn't need to 'go to top'.
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 7:38 AM, kekronbekron
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@
Works ok for me.
I should say, I do like the generous use of IBM Plex and the look of the site.
Hope they get rid of the feedback banner at the bottom soon.
Or at least make it an easy to use set of buttons in the footer (where language
selection is).
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/cics-ts/5.2?topic
Actually, the lack of a metalanguage is the norm except for assemblers; PL/I is
an exception in that regard. Ada, Go, Java, Perl, Python, Ruby, Raku (Perl 6),
Rust, etc., lack metalanguages.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From:
Keep in mind that the metalanguage for C and C++ is horribly crude; it can't do
the sorts of things that make macro attractive in other languages.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LIST
I have used it extensively. It is way better than nothing but it has some
severe limitations.
Also it is only DSECT to C struct. The OP was looking for, and I am interested
in, any to any.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
The z/OS XL C/C++ DSECT conversion utility (
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.3.0?topic=guide-dsect-conversion-utility)
may provide a small piece of what you're looking for.
Peter Van Dyke
HCL Software
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 at 06:55, Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Hi. IBM File Manager has a 'View Load Module' function which can show the
compilers used to create the CSECTs in a load module. Recent enhancements
to 'View Load Module' provide the ability to search load modules for
particular types of CSECTs. For example, you could search a library for the
load m
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 17:11:41 -0300, Clark Morris wrote:
>I would like to see a set of two way conversion tools that would
>convert COBOL copybooks to Assembler DSECTs and vice versa, SORT
>symbols to and from Assembler DSECTs, PL1 structures to and from
>Assembler DSECTs etc. If this were availabl
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 10:23:58 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>
>#ifdef WIN32
>static const bool IsZOS = false;
>#else
>static const bool IsZOS = true;
>#endif
>
Hmmm ... Anything that isn't WIN32 is z/OS.
∴ Linux == z/OS;
(Granted, I'm unfamiliar with your environment.)
But I once on a FOSS project ma
Re: zOS.e, yes there was.
CVTOSLV5 DCXL1'7F' BYTE 5 OF CVTOSLVL
CVTZOSE EQU X'80' z/OS.e
CVTZOSAS EQU X'80' z/OS.e
CVTPUMA EQU X'80' z/OS.e
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lo
Right after the decision, Google announced they are replacing Oracle financial
software with SAP. I remember when Oracle bigots claimed it was going to own
the IT world and replace DB2. About the same time “experts” said the mainframe
would be dead by 2000.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
O
1. I have my reasons that I do not wish to go into in public. They are valid
reasons, and no, the reason does not involve bypassing any restriction.
2. I do not want to use the CPU machine type for the exact reasons you
describe. I know IBM has done this with other models from time to time. I am
I have given a lot of thought to such a product.
I have experience with converting Assembler ADATA into a proprietary record
layout schema.
If anyone has ideas on how to pursue this please contact me off-line. E-mail
address should be above.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainfra
When I used Chrome from my employer's Win10 laptop all the google hits for
"CICS PIPELINE SCAN" included this prefix in the google hit url:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/. . .
and all of them transferred immediately to an IBM docs url and an actual
informational page there, like
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/18-956_d18f.pdf
--
Robert AH Prins
robert.ah.prins(a)gmail.com
The hitchhiking grandfather - https://prino.neocities.org/
Some REXX code for use on z/OS - https://prino.neocities.org/zOS/zOS-Tools.html
---
This was posted to the PL/I list today, I thought it might be useful to
also post it here,just in case anyone here feels like volunteering.
Robert
-- Forwarded message -
From: Dick Duggan
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 16:48
Subject: Group Ownership
To:
Hi all,
I've been the sole ow
I would like to see a set of two way conversion tools that would
convert COBOL copybooks to Assembler DSECTs and vice versa, SORT
symbols to and from Assembler DSECTs, PL1 structures to and from
Assembler DSECTs etc. If this were available it would be possible to
convert COBOL record descriptions
.HelloAnyone experiencing problems with IBMs new doc site ?.For Example:If I
google CICS PIPELINE SCAN , I am presented with many references to
documentation with "pipeline scan"If any of these references invoke the old
Knowledge Center, I am re-directed to a new IBM doc site..However I am
pres
I think they have a letter from the estate for their use, but even that
letter has got to be really old. Last time I mentioned XBOL, someone
mentioned they were still running it on z/OS. (My client is z/VSE.)
It's really a crappy language. All the variables are a combination of a
letter and a
So, this question got me thinking.
We have a few ZD&T instances running here. I was not fully involved with the
group bringing it in, other than setting some ground rules regarding
customization, and "who" would be supporting.
My recollection though, is that the Terms & Conditions of Z
I just happened to be on our zPDT system, and here's a partial output of the D
M=CPU command.
CPC ND = z1090.Axx.IBM.02.usapfzpdt01p
CPC SI = 1090.306.IBM.02.
Model: L03
Something there might be usable for checking.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encry
IBM and vendors' will have model 1090 and customers' 1091, zPDT and zD&T
respectively.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of PINION, RICHARD W.
Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 6:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mach
Interesting. I would presume your client received the source due to an escrow
clause in the original contract. Any chance the original XBOL developer's
estate would allow the product to be open-sourced for community development?
Or is it abandonware at this point?
Peter
-Original Messag
zPDT shows a CPU model number of 1090. Perhaps you could use that?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 1:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Machine-readable flag for "development-only z/OS'
[External Ema
I know IBM sells z/OS licenses that are for development only, such as the Z
Development and Test Environment.
Is there a machine-readable flag that indicates that a z/OS instance is
development only? Would it be possible to write an app that, just as an
example, refused to run in such an environme
> But IMHO none easy to learn or use.
I am generally not a fan of meta languages at all. I think writing programs is
hard enough, without having to write two effective programs: one that runs at
compile time and one that runs at run time.
In my C++, which is now my primary language, I eschew th
There are lots of text processing languages, some general purpose and some,
e.g., XSLT, intended for specific types of text files.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on
Oops. Yes, Knuth not Wirth.
Agreed that meta-language that is close to the base language is the easiest to
learn and use.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 1:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
> Probably also Wirth's "literate programming" suite, TeX I think it is called.
Two different things, both by Knuth. Wirth was ALGOL W, Pascal and PL360.
> But IMHO none easy to learn or use.
LaTeX, based on TeX, may not be as easy as GML and SCRIPT, but it's not that
hard to learn and it does
> I understand that BAL had some of that unification; lost in subsequent
> assemblers which distinguish EQU from SETA.
BAL didn't have any metalanguage at all.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [
I am helping support a customer that has XBOL which generates COBOL. The
original developer has passed away, but my client has the source. We
have had to make changes for 'gone' COBOL verbs and such.
I don't think CA's MetaCobol is currently marketed. I talked to them
several years ago about i
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 16:30:53 +, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
>True. There is m4 in *ix systems and going back a long time there was ML/1 (I
>think there was an academic book published on that one, I think I have a copy
>somewhere around here). Undoubtedly others I do not know of or remember.
True. There is m4 in *ix systems and going back a long time there was ML/1 (I
think there was an academic book published on that one, I think I have a copy
somewhere around here). Undoubtedly others I do not know of or remember.
Probably also Wirth's "literate programming" suite, TeX I think i
Aren't there "generic" meta languages: meta languages that may be used to
generate any sort of text, including source code for most any language?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Mon
True for the language itself, but at least one ISV addressed that lack -- the
MetaCOBOL product. I have forgotten who the original vendor ISV was - maybe
ADR? -- but I think it now resides somewhere in the CA / Broadcom universe.
IMHO PL/1 (and no doubt the PL/X internal IBM language from the l
The literal answer to your question is COPY. Assembler COPY is completely the
analog of COBOL COPY.
Assembler COPY is less powerful than COBOL COPY: there is no COPY REPLACING in
assembler.
OTOH, Assembler has macros, which are like COPY but much, much more powerful.
I am going to go out on a
> I appreciate the help and suggestions. And, if SAS was the only culprit, I'd
> work at isolating SAS. . . .
As a side note, there is a very bad performance defect [as designed] with SAS
ODS Excel on z/OS. There is very significant CPU consumption with creation of
large ODS Excel documents to
Warren, that depends slightly. Put a member in some MACLIB. If it is
truly a copybook, then COPY member (not in column 1, I usually put COPY
in 10 and member in 16). If it is truly a macro, then just specify the
name, like IHAPSA DSECT=YES and it will expand (again not in column 1).
Ramsey
Hello,
I've been away for a while. What is the assembly language equivalent for a
COBOL copybook?
Thanks,
Warren
On Monday, March 29, 2021, 11:08:43 AM EDT, Wendell Lovewell
<01e9c0ee0673-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
Hello all.
Does anyone know if Dr Ehrman's excellent
Is this the page you're looking for? (mind the wrap)
https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=dd&subtype=sm&appname=ShopzSeries&htmlfid=897/ENUS5650-ZOS
Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development
Chuck Norris never uses CHECK when he applies PTFs.
-
Good morning. I am not sure if this is the appropriate list but I didn't
really see one for Websphere.
I have an error coming out at startup where the system is looking for a .java
directory and can't find it in the location identified in a RACF error message
(MKDIR command). However there is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Saturday, April 3, 2021 8:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: No file permissions or super user authority for
executing a shell script
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 13:26:07 +,
Good day,
Recently I have been getting these kinds of alerts from my HMC. It all
started when I connected an old DS6800 and the details are:
Node 1
Machine: 2498-B40
Serial: IBMCA107312B
Physical Interface: 6620
Logical Interface: 0020
Node 2
Machine: 1750-511
Serial: IBM13715
Physical Inter
44 matches
Mail list logo
