I hate to make this more complicated, but if (all of) the LPARs are not
connected via a plex or CTC's, then you can't use some of these suggestions.
The reason DASD was used originally with a lot of old time software (think
Checkpoint datasets) was because it was available to ALL of the LPARs th
Perhaps SMC-D or SMC-R.
Probably don't need to run authorized for this.
However, you'll need daemon tasks on each system, I suppose to send/receive.
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, August 11th, 2021 at 12:52 AM, Allan Staller
<0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Just to be clear, there is no case to ever include SYS1.SCSFMOD0. That
dataset should never be in any since HCR77D0 (z/OS V2R4) because it is not
a programming interface. Everything that was in there that was intended as
a programming interface is now in SYS1.SCSFSTUB.
ASM programs should be us
I wrote up the results of trying Dave Plummer's software drag racing on
z/OS.
The focus is mainly Java vs C++ because I do SMF processing in Java, and
people like to tell me Java is too slow. Results are here:
https://www.blackhillsoftware.com/news/2021/08/10/java-vs-c-drag-racing-on-z-os/
T
Hi Barry,
Interesting. But I can't quite get it to work. What's bizarre is that the DLL
linkage seems to get resolved:
IMPORT/EXPORT TYPESYMBOL DLL DDNAME SEQ
MEMBER
- -- ---
--
Classification: Confidential
XCF (either via CF or CTC)).
RYO method for communication
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steff Gladstone
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 7:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Communication between two computer syst
This complaint has come up every so often. There is something already in the
binder that works. However it requires a control statements one-for-one with
each IMPORT statement. The control statement is a restricted no-call LIBRARY
statement, it looks simply like this (with the parentheses):
Thank you for your quick response Mr. Ross.
The answer to your question is that we no longer have DEBUG TOOL, and
the replacement vendor doesn't support the DWARF protocol/format. I
chose NOTEST(DWARF) because the documentation indicated that LE CEEDUMP
was able to access/process the addition
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, at 14:30, David Spiegel wrote:
> Hi Steff,
> Have the application which updates the data put out a WTO which triggers
> your Automation to schedule Tasks on all other LPARs (e.g. RO *ALL, S
> UPDATE).
I'd just add: make sure the automation process validates who issued the
WT
Hi Steff,
Have the application which updates the data put out a WTO which triggers
your Automation to schedule Tasks on all other LPARs (e.g. RO *ALL, S
UPDATE).
Regards,
David
On 2021-08-10 08:06, Steff Gladstone wrote:
We have global data pointed to by a name-token that is available to all
It's less overhead to have a permanent STC on each LPAR and use a MODIFY
command for change notification.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Massimo Biancu
Steff,
it's not so simple to understand the scenario and the goal you need to
achieve in terms of "response time and certainness" of the result.
There're different ways, Sysplex Services (other guys already mentioned) or
developing a STC that runs on every LPAR listening to IP stack.
The problem
Doesn't that require authorization, which the OP wishes to avoid?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
esst...@juno.com [esst...@juno.com]
Sent: Tuesday, Augu
You could have a VTAM application on each system; I can't think of a simpler
way that doesn't require authorization.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Ste
You may want to consider using some of the SYSPLEX Services (log
streams/structures)
-- Original Message --
From: Steff Gladstone
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Communication between two computer systems (LPARS or physical)
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 15:06:22 +0300
We have gl
We have global data pointed to by a name-token that is available to all the
address spaces in each computer system. We want to make sure that any
updates to the data in one system are broadcast to the other computer
systems in the installation (LPARs or physical computers). Or at the very
least n
16 matches
Mail list logo
