Thanks, this looks very good;
the header on page 14 describes exactly what I had in mind:
Join fields from two files on a key
In this section, we show some tricks for joining fields from two files
in different ways using the JOINKEYS
function of DFSORT
Radoslaw will sure be able to do the
Doh...
Like count = Like count + 1
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Lennie Bradshaw
Sent: 07 September 2021 00:06
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RENT binder option - note of thanks!
Like count = Link count + 1
-Original Message-
Like count = Link count + 1
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Brennan
Sent: 06 September 2021 22:02
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RENT binder option - note of thanks!
Like count=1
On 9/6/2021 1:15 PM, Mike Hochee wrote:
> Just a word
I would suggest using DFSORT with JOINKEYS.
See the example on page 15 here:
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/system/files/inline-files/$FILE/sorttrck.pdf
Joe
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 4:24 PM Bernd Oppolzer
wrote:
> Hi Radoslaw,
>
> I am not a DFSORT wizard, but:
>
> this is similar to a
Hi Radoslaw,
I am not a DFSORT wizard, but:
this is similar to a INNER JOIN SQL query;
if I had a DB2 system at hand, I would load the SUM and ABC records into
two different
DB2 tables and do a SELECT statement involving an inner join, this would
give the desired result.
Maybe the same can
Like count=1
On 9/6/2021 1:15 PM, Mike Hochee wrote:
Just a word of thanks to the IBM heavyweights (Jim, Peter, Sri, et. al.) to
whom a debt of gratitude is owed for their deep-water expertise, patience, and
willingness to share knowledge when they undoubtedly have many other things to
work
Just a word of thanks to the IBM heavyweights (Jim, Peter, Sri, et. al.) to
whom a debt of gratitude is owed for their deep-water expertise, patience, and
willingness to share knowledge when they undoubtedly have many other things to
work on.
I suspect there are many subscriber motivations
I have the following task to do:
PS file, VB records, different types.
Two types are in scope of interest:
SUMeeeNAME123456eee...
ABCeNAME123456e
SUM and ABC are record identifiers.
NAME123456 is 10-char field I need to analyze
e is irrelevant content.
The
A module in an authorized concatenation with the RENT attribute will go into
SP 252 key 0 storage even if it doesn't have the REFR attribute. I don't recall
whether it will also be page protected. With some changes in detail, that
behavior goes all the way back to OS/360 MVT.
--
Shmuel
On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 18:34:36 +1000, Andrew Rowley wrote:
>...
>I ran into this many years ago when I "cleaned up" and removed an empty
>library from the STEPLIB of one of our subsystems. That suddenly meant
>that the STEPLIB was considered APF authorized, which resulted in S0C4
>abends when the
In a PTF, I believe that you need the ++ DELETE; I believe that you can force a
rebuild with a RESTORE and APPLY. Possibly ++ JCLIN?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
Earlier statements in this thread? No. Earlier statements in other threads?
Many times.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
לְשָׁנָה טוֹבָה תִכָּתֵבוּ וְתֵּחָתֵמוּ
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on
On Mon, 6 Sep 2021 15:19:48 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Yes, BTDT,GTTS. IMHO, installing PDS86, StarTool oe whatever the current name
>is, is a no brainer, and we owe Bruce a debt of gratitude.
>
What path does SMP/E, which does not supporrt the StarTool utility, provide
for upgrading a load
Hi R'Shmuel AMV"SH,
Don't you agree that your earlier statement has been refuted?
Please see: פרקי אבות 5:9
שׁוֹאֵל כְּעִנְיָן וּמֵשִׁיב כַּהֲלָכָה
Regards,
David
On 2021-09-06 11:19, Seymour J Metz wrote:
Yes, BTDT,GTTS. IMHO, installing PDS86, StarTool oe whatever the current name
is, is a no
Yes, BTDT,GTTS. IMHO, installing PDS86, StarTool oe whatever the current name
is, is a no brainer, and we owe Bruce a debt of gratitude.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Glad you found it. Seems your Db2 subsystems aren't entirely cloned...
... I was pondering Datasharing Group level things versus Subsystem
things. DSNZPARM is, of course, a Subsystem thing - so members even in the
same Datasharing Group can have different DSNZPARM values, such as this
one.
16 matches
Mail list logo
