TBD; will cross that bridge when we come to it. Scheduler, most likely.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Friday, March 4, 2022 10:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
Does that apply when there is no consensus on whether something is broken?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 17:01:34 +, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
>I stress again, I am not trying to find an alternative to using delay in this
>manner. I am trying to determine what job are USING delay in this manner.
>
How do you intend to use that information?
Do you intend to make any changes?
On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 10:29:54 -0600, Steve Beaver wrote:
>TADz spins out a .CSV file for each LPAR/PLEX in the house. It has the
>usual basic into
>
Are you asking a question?
Is the .CSV created on the z? The desktop? Elsewhere?
>Vendor, etc., Status TADz is basically stipid. It will tell
I stress again, I am not trying to find an alternative to using delay in this
manner. I am trying to determine what job are USING delay in this manner.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Joel C. Ewing
Sent: Friday, March 4, 2022 7:29 AM
To:
Back before Old Man Noach cornered the market if Gofer wood, you needed to
allocate a pseude-punch or pseudo-CTCA in order to write to the internal
reader. I don't recall a bottleneck once HASP became JES2 and ASP became JES3.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
I wasn't proposing a change in the defaults; I was proposing a new SET option,
e.g., SET NOEDIT, to change the TRUNC behavior. And, yes, I know that a macro
can play with the setting: BTDT,GTTS (no scars, just the tee shirt.) But it's
SET PENDING that makes XEDIT a joy to edit under.
What I
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 14:35:41 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>That is not a workaround for the problem that I'm addressing. Consider the
>command
>
> CHANGE /FOO/FOOBARBAZ/
>
>on a line with few spaces. With TRUNC 72, text can spill over into the
>continuation column. The change I'm suggesting
TADz spins out a .CSV file for each LPAR/PLEX in the house. It has the
usual basic into
Vendor, etc., Status TADz is basically stipid. It will tell me the PDS and
VOLSER for this discussion.
I have sanitized the .CSV to get rid of the extraneous Not Installed
messages.
The problem is
On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:29:44 -0600, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
>Note also that it has been mentioned before in this forum in other
>contexts: submitting two jobs with the same job name in sequence and
>expecting "DELAY" to force them to run in the sequence submitted is only
>valid if you have a single
other way I know to have both, cake and eat it too, is to use JES2 job
groups, I've played around with JES2 batch scheduling and defining job
groups, and I've had a user test this also, not so easy but an option if
you want no-delay and dependent job execution without using a scheduler
Or ue the JES facilities. JES3 has been able to handle that since it was ASP,
and JES2 has had it for a while now. Are there many JES2 installations so
backlevel that they don't have SCHEDULE?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
Note also that it has been mentioned before in this forum in other
contexts: submitting two jobs with the same job name in sequence and
expecting "DELAY" to force them to run in the sequence submitted is only
valid if you have a single JES2 Converter//I/nterpreter running, which I
suspect is
I was wondering if anyone has ever automated the data retrieval of the
dayhsmry.txt file into the graphics and reporting spreadsheet? I have to
manually import the data each month, and sometimes forget to do it on the 1st.
Regards,
John Benik
This e-mail, including attachments, may include
Classification: Confidential
>I know for a fact that we have some jobs that depend on DELAY, because I
>turned on NODELAY and it caused an issue. Two jobs with the same name are
>submitted at the same time (or one after the other), where job 1 copies a file
>to a second file, and job 2
Classification: Confidential
JES2 (for several years now) has offered the option of allowing duplicate names
to run concurrently.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2022 4:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
16 matches
Mail list logo
