Enzo,
I think you’ve got two questions, really. The first I can answer: updating the
microcode on this class of equipment requires a qualified “chaperone," either
on-site or remote. So I’m afraid you can’t just go to a Web site, grab a
microcode bundle, and install it.
Assuming no microcode
I would naïvely expect MODE=HOME to cause fewer hit rather than causing more.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Peter Relson [rel...@us.ibm.com]
Sent:
Can you start to a new window as an alternative to a new tab? That was my
common use case for WSA.
Also, what is performance like?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
Jack Zukt wrote:
>Between those three, I would say that rmm has an unfriendly user interface,
>but I suppose that is just the IBM way. I really liked Control-M ease of
>use. CA1 was, and I am sure it still is, a great product, and the
>transition to Control-My was easy to do. The transition to rmm
https://developers.slashdot.org/story/22/06/12/0023234/museum-restores-21-rare-videos-from-legendary-1976-computing-conference
--
Gabriel Goldberg, Computers and Publishing, Inc. g...@gabegold.com
3401 Silver Maple Place, Falls Church, VA 22042 (703) 204-0433
LinkedIn:
Hello. I am a high school student who has recently purchased a z114 mainframe
(I have posted about the project before here). I have been working to find CKD
storage for my machine, so that I can do a proper z/OS installation. I have an
opportunity to acquire a DS8884 storage unit that I know
On Sun, 12 Jun 2022 16:15:11 -0400, Don Leahy wrote:
>Yes, ISPF stats are too easily manipulated to be reliable. I regard them
>as a convenience and would not try to use them for serious source control
>purposes.
>
Here, I laud SMP/E for employing relations in a VSAM data base rather
than file
Yes, ISPF stats are too easily manipulated to be reliable. I regard them
as a convenience and would not try to use them for serious source control
purposes.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 12:31 Paul Gilmartin <
042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2022 10:26:38
On Sun, 12 Jun 2022 10:26:38 -0400, Don Leahy wrote:
>It was also aware of ISPF stats, so on a WS to host xfer it could compare
>dates and only transfer changed files.
>
But beware. Timestamps at both ends may be under user control.
I have scripts that deliberately change timestamps of some
I like big screens with lots of open windows. Even though the WSA GUI was
clunky and had poor cut-and-paste support, it did let see see multiple ISPF
splits concurrently.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe
It was also aware of ISPF stats, so on a WS to host xfer it could compare
dates and only transfer changed files. It’s always mystified me that the
non-GUI functionality supported by WSA never really caught on. The
trifling task of installing the WSA.EXE seemed to be too big an obstacle
for many
11 matches
Mail list logo
