Charles Mills wrote:
>Where did this self-signed certificate come from? What tool generated it?
It was internally generated. That's all I know. It's a test system.
>Case should not be a problem in a self-signed certificate. Technically I
guess it is possible but you would almost have to do
looks like TRACE need to be before VSTOR(S) ?
TRACE being a major parm, with VSTOR(S) and other options being minor
parms under TRACE?
I'm a CMF shop so I cannot test, but looking at my old RMF parms
NOTRACE
VSTOR(S)
WKLS
Carmen
On 9/8/2022 12:53 PM, Pierre Fichaud wrote:
Where
Depends on what level of zOS you are at, RMF has been recently been
split into the Data Gatherer and RMF components.
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=zos-rmf
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=zos-data-gatherer
Michael
At 12:53 PM 9/8/2022, Pierre Fichaud wrote:
Where do
Is there another synthetic transaction like a PING / CESN / something else they
can run during the slowdown? This might quickly assess if its a network versus
CICS resource issue.
Matt Hogstrom
“It may be cognitive, but, it ain’t intuitive."
— Hogstrom
> On Sep 8, 2022, at 3:01 AM, Brian
Where do I find doc for the ERBFRMxx member in PARMLIB ?
I change NOTRACE to TRACE and I get a syntax error.
. 33 IOQ(NOCOMM)/* NO COMMUNICATION
I/O QUEUEING*/ .
. 34 IOQ(NOGRAPH) /* NO
So those who currently are licensed will be unable to renew next year?
I guess there are enough System Z professionals out in the workforce now...
On 9/7/2022 4:10 AM, Jay Maynard wrote:
I got mine in May. I've been told that IBM has quietly discontinued the
program, though.
On Tue, Sep 6,
Where did this self-signed certificate come from? What tool generated it?
Case should not be a problem in a self-signed certificate. Technically I guess
it is possible but you would almost have to do it on purpose.
I think the trace is pretty clear. I don't fully understand the big picture,
Peter
You are right while doing my analysis
I found some erroneous data returned not really erroneous
But I did screen print so it’s not made up
The allocated block address is FF7A5000
Looking at the doc mapping macro
IGVVSMD for the block descriptor it’s
VSMDBLKDSA
Now I know
And in Parmlib as:
BROWSESYS1.PARMLIB(ERBRMF02) Line 42 Col 001 080
Command ===> Scroll ===> CSR
TRACE(RCVUICA,END) /* TRACE 'UIC AVERAGE' */
TRACE(RCVCPUA,END) /* TRACE 'CPU
Phil,
Yes, it's TLSv1.3:
sorry I missed this.
You mean the label in the gskkyman entry?
I was thinking the entry, Cert that was added to RACF, that's where I had
similar issues.
sorry I could not be more help
Carmen
On 9/8/2022 10:31 AM, Phil Smith III wrote:
Yes, it's TLSv1.3:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=rmf-zos-programmers-guide
See the sections on tracing.
Michael
ee the section on
At 09:23 AM 9/8/2022, Pierre Fichaud wrote:
In the RMF manuals, there is no mention of this SMF type.
How can I get these generated?
Thanks in advance, Pierre.
Carmen Vitullo asked:
>Phil, was this output from an SSL trace?
Yes.
>IIRC there's usually more data related to a cert error, it's been 7, or
>8 years since I ran the trace but usually the trace data
>shows the TLS version also, it's a stretch but are you running TSL 1.1
>or higher?
Joe R wrote:
Let me use an example 0001 7000 01000 0001 7000 0800
So the allocated address is 7800 for 200
Close.
The freed storage starts at 7000 and runs for 800.
That means that allocated storage starts at 7800 and runs for 800.
If you showed more data that
>Has anyone successfully received the zD learners edition setup yet? I
>realize this is about zpdt, but it reminded me that I was told that I was
>approved last November, but nothing seems to have happened after that time.
The SG24-8205-06 book covers basic zPDT functions in the ISV zPDT
unless I'm missing it, I don't see where you're telling SMF to write
these records
snip from my SMFPRM
STATUS(SMF,SYNC) /* WRITE SMF STATS AT INTERVAL */
SYS(TYPE(0:3,6:19,21:33,36:39,41:98,99(1,6,12),100:255),
My SMF parms include all SMF types.
. 01 INTVAL(01) /* SET SMF INTERVAL A 01
MIN MEASAP*/ .
. 02 SYNCVAL(01)/* SYNC SMF AT 01 MIN
MEASAP*/ .
. 03
I think your SMF PARMS needs to specify the records are to be collected -
and where to put them.
Colin
On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 15:23, Pierre Fichaud wrote:
> In the RMF manuals, there is no mention of this SMF type.
> How can I get these generated?
>
> Thanks in advance, Pierre.
>
>
In the RMF manuals, there is no mention of this SMF type.
How can I get these generated?
Thanks in advance, Pierre.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
Phil, was this output from an SSL trace?
IIRC there's usually more data related to a cert error, it's been 7, or
8 years since I ran the trace but usually the trace data
shows the TLS version also, it's a stretch but are you running TSL 1.1
or higher?
I'd agree with Attila also, I've had
Attila Fogarasi kindly replied suggesting a case problem, which I'm
perfectly willing to believe but don't have any idea how to verify. Nothing
LOOKS off.
Meanwhile, some more digging suggests that it may be that the error message
is actually correct and clear, FSVO clear!
If I run
openssl
It sounds like either you are not both doing "exactly" the same transaction, or
there could be a network issue between the two locations, although networks
tend to slow things down for a handful of seconds, not minutes. Are you sure
that the transaction isn't waiting for something? Is it
Jay Maynard wrote:
>My understanding is that a Wazi user gets no access to the OS system level
>at all. A Wazi user cannot do any systems modifications, period: no access
>to system parameters, no ability to alter any specifications, no console
>access beyond what an application programmer might
22 matches
Mail list logo
