Enjoy your retirement!
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 12:22 PM Tom Sims wrote:
> My apologies to anyone who feels this post inappropriate, but in view of
> my imminent retirement, I want thank the entire IBM-MAIN community for
> the 3+ decades of knowledge and support that have helped make my
>
Bitsavers has IBM System/360 Operating System Control program Services, dated
April, 1968. STIMER is in page 108. TASK and REAL are both there, as are exit
and wait.
Does that count as "always"?
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/360/os/R01-08/C28-6541-1_Control_Program_Services_Apr66.pdf
--
In IMS Transaction Manager you can define a PROCLIM for each transaction, with
a count and/or CPU-time-per-transaction, aka the "processing limit count time".
The manual says:
This is the amount of time (for non-Fast-Path transactions, in seconds; for
Fast Path transactions, in hundredths of
If the 650 stuff includes either the negative index register instructions (they
plus table lookup equal were an RPQ), please scan them for bitsavers. The same
goes for any 704 or 709 manuals you have.
Even better if there's somebody willing to scan and OCR the lot.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
My apologies to anyone who feels this post inappropriate, but in view of
my imminent retirement, I want thank the entire IBM-MAIN community for
the 3+ decades of knowledge and support that have helped make my
employment and professional development a reality.
Most especially, even at the risk
On 1/23/24 10:57, Robert Prins wrote:
My father worked for IBM in the Netherlands for more than 30 years,
starting as a CE in the late 1950'ies. Last year he was diagnosed with
Alzheimer, and over the past few months my siblings and me have been
emptying his apartment and storage room, and we've
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 08:30:54 -0500, Joseph Reichman
wrote:
>For Estae says amode 24 or 31
ESTAEX supports SYSSTATE AMODE=64
>Regardless if I established a recovery in 31 but storage and then branched to
>64 bit storage
>Under the same RB
>
>I assume the recovery routine would cover me
The last major RACF project I architected was for something I presume would
probably fit your clients bill here. Some of the necessary elements we
incorporated were:
Delegated (though not via RACF means) Ownership of all RACF general resource
and dataset profiles - thereby making sure that
Was the a drum-based CPC before the 305?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Leonard D Woren
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 1:56
Classification: Confidential
Try Vanguard software. http://www.go2vanguard.com/
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bob
Bridges
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 4:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RACF Automation (Cross Posted)
[CAUTION:
Searched the archives and saw an article from Peter Relson dated 12/2020
I just did search on the authorized services vol 4 ( set-wto) for rmode
Got a hit on the storage and wait macros “including 64”
For Estae says amode 24 or 31
For SETFRR includes amode 64
Regardless if I established a
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:38:10 -0500 Joseph Reichman
wrote:
:>Just wondering is there any recovery for a program running RMODE 64 don't
:>see that with ESTAE or SETFRR
CVTBSM0F
:>As more and more services run above the bar
:>More so SDWAEC1 and SDWAEC2 are only 8 bytes
SDWARC4
--
Binyamin
12 matches
Mail list logo
