Re: Mainframer Lunch

2024-03-12 Thread Mike Schwab
https://community.ibm.com/community/user/integration/communities/globalgrouphome?CommunityKey=e22492ad-a425-4d88-b8af-19d978e58af5 On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 9:41 PMwrote: > > Hey, > I would like to have a LUNCH get together with any mainframer's in the > Indianapolis Indiana area. > Maybe once

Mainframer Lunch

2024-03-12 Thread
Hey, I would like to have a LUNCH get together with any mainframer's in the Indianapolis Indiana area. Maybe once a month? If interested, let me know ming...@prodigy.net David Mingee 317 903-9455 Thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscri

Re: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation question

2024-03-12 Thread Rupert Reynolds
Worth checking DIGITS after function calls--I forget the exact circumstances, but I remember a surprise return to defaults happened at times. Roops On Wed, 13 Mar 2024, 00:14 Charles Mills, wrote: > Well sure enough, a Say right after the NUMERIC DIGITS 15 works as > expected. > > There are no

Re: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation question

2024-03-12 Thread Sri Hari Kolusu
Charles, Can you display the form just before you display the multiplied value? say 'numeric form is : ' form() say 8947 * 864 Thanks, Kolusu -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email

Re: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation question

2024-03-12 Thread Charles Mills
Well sure enough, a Say right after the NUMERIC DIGITS 15 works as expected. There are no other NUMERIC instructions in the program. What else could be messing me up? The program is not unusual. The most interesting thing is an EXECIO DISKR 1. Charles On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:39:21 +0200, Itsch

Re: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation question

2024-03-12 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:29:16 -0500, Charles Mills wrote: > >(Why do I care? I am subsequently going to add a relatively small number to >the product and don't want to lose low-order digits.) > Set DIGITS to (FSVO) enough. >I tried using FORMAT but unless I use it in every subsequent calculation

Re: EDC8114I Address family not supported

2024-03-12 Thread Peter Ten Eyck
Thanks, I think I see the issue now. Our BPXPRMXX member was not processed correctly at IPL time, leaving the "Address Family" settings incorrectly configured. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, s

Re: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation question

2024-03-12 Thread Itschak Mugzach
Charles, Tried it with 20, 12 and 11 numeric digits. All returned the correct number (7730208). Your problem may be related to numeric FORM. Best, ITschak *| **Itschak Mugzach | Director | SecuriTeam Software **|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitoring for Z/OS

Sv: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation question

2024-03-12 Thread Lars Höglund
Hmmm 7 *-* NUMERIC DIGITS 11 >>> "11" 8 *-* say digits() >>> "11" 11 9 *-* say 8947 * 864 >>> "7730208" 7730208

Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation question

2024-03-12 Thread Charles Mills
In a Rexx program I start out by executing NUMERIC DIGITS 15 (and I have also tried 11 and 13 and gotten the same result). For 8947 * 864 I am getting a result of 7.73020800E+10 rather than the desired 7730208. Is this to be expected? I interpret the Rexx documentation as saying that a

Re: EDC8114I Address family not supported

2024-03-12 Thread Frank Swarbrick
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/3.1.0?topic=errnojrs-description-location-information https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/3.1.0?topic=errnojrs-zos-unix-reason-codes For this one, the part means JrOK, see return code (no additional information). You can also use the bpxmtext program, which is av

Re: EDC8114I Address family not supported

2024-03-12 Thread Colin Paice
See https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/edc8114i-error-cause-concern https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/isklm-zos-will-not-start-correctly may be relevant Have you configured something with IPV6 and IP V6 is not enabled? Colin On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 14:05, Peter Ten Eyck < 04d3761a18a7-dmarc-r

EDC8114I Address family not supported

2024-03-12 Thread Peter Ten Eyck
I am looking in https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/SSLTBW_2.4.0/pdf/bpxa800_v2r4.pdf for information on this message: EDC8114I Address family not supported. Errno/Rsn=1114/112B I only see information for: 1114 EAFNOSUPPORT The address family is not supported. Where can I find out more, in pa