RMF III - Data recording duration

Hello Group Just wanted to understand where exactly we define the duration of data recording under RMF III, I believe it's ERBRMF04 but am not sure which parameter can set a recording of 2 days of data gathering or a week of data Could someone please guide me ? Regards Peter ---

Testdriving svc in key 9 (was: finding callers key in svc)

Hello Peter, My apologies for not changing the subject. I managed to show now that the code in the svc is correct, it indicated that the caller was in key 9. I've solved the testdriver issue now by marking that routine as REFReshable and put it in SYS1.LINKLIB. I saw an old thread about this th

Re: EBCDIC/ASCII - FTP

At some customer I use a java zip tool derived from IBM sample that can convert to a destination (e.g. IBM850, UTF-8 etc.) CCSID on the fly. Of course the whole byte sequence must be zoned character or you'll encounter issues reading file after unzipping at the destination. Best regards. Max

Re: finding callers key in svc

Please try to have different threads with suitable subjects for each. The 0C4 is unrelated to the subject. Since the code shown for the SVC routine is correct for type 2/3/4 yet you say that you do not find the right data, then prove it: Show the definition of the SVC, show extracts from IPCS lo

Re: Homegrown ZOS Dashboards?

On Thu, 2 May 2024 03:20:20 +, Timothy Sipples wrote: >Charles Mills wrote: >>I meant "obvious" in the sense of "it's the official Splunk solution." > >Is it? I haven�t found that sort of statement. Am I not looking hard enough? >And even if so would that be a good thing or bad thing? Wow!

Re: finding callers key in svc

Use the ATTACHX macro with KEY=NINE to attach a key 9 subtask. That's what CICS does. Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie NY >Is there a way to force the program to go to subpool 244 for example, that is >not fetch protected? >I'm trying to create a

Re: Weird error with class DATASET

Hi Peter, Thank you for your input. It is a bit strange reading your statement " To be picky, RACF never "interferes". RACF only answers a question asked of it. " as I so frequently said something akin to that so many times over the years. Should RACF be called on what would be a second extent

Re: finding callers key in svc

I can see in the dump that my program is in subpool 251 and this is fetch protected, so it explains the abend I guess. SUBPOOL 251 KEY 08 OWNED BY TCB 008D2AA0 ADDRESS 2000 LENGTH 2000 FREE AREA 2000 LENGTH 00A8 Is there a way to force the program to go to