Thank you,
I had not even noticed the change until it was called to my attention. The
biggest issue has been the when re-creating the numbers sometimes are too large
to be done with ISPF 3.2 if you don't change them to tracks or cylinders.
Again, thanks for the link and the explanation.
Brian
We got it figured out. A simple SELECT did a commit that freed up the lock.
We tried everything but...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 5:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] DB2 lock quest
On 8/10/2024 4:07 am, Eric Erickson wrote:
I'm really surprised that this code does not abend or toss some kind of error,
if the string is getting marked as released before we are done with it. I
suppose it could be related to when the JVM actually runs the garbage
collection that recovers the
Jay,
Here are some examples:
CU3958 write_smf_record: entered with type -2.
CU2086 write_smfTable_record_119: entered with table index 1.
CU1865 subtype_103: entered
CU1924 build_security_section: entered
GU5348 ftpSetApplData: entered
The messages are probably are meant for FTP developer use wh
Hi list,
Yes, this is a db2 problem but I don't know what happened to my signon into the
db2 list so here goes. We started a DR test this morning with a flashcopy of
our production system - and managed to get a DB2 transaction mid flight. Now,
in our DR test sandbox, we have a DB2 lock being
I found examples like this in z/OS Communications Server 3.1 IP Messages:
Volume 2 (EZB, EZD)
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/SSLTBW_3.1.0/pdf/halw001_v3r1.pdf
> Jun 19 22:34:08 MVS073 IKE: Message instance 3: *** SA Context Information ***
> Jun 19 22:34:08 MVS073 IKE: Message instance 3: Phase 2
These appear to be internal messages. If you look at the IP Users Guide,
page 156 you will see some of these messages. I suspect they are
routine/module names.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 2:30 PM Mike Shaw wrote:
> When executing FTP in batch on z/OS V2R5 with the '-d' option in the JCL
> PARM= fie
What's the rest of the message?
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 2:30 PM Mike Shaw wrote:
> When executing FTP in batch on z/OS V2R5 with the '-d' option in the JCL
> PARM= field:
>
> PARM='sitename.com -d (TIMEOUT 720'
>
> we see a LOT of messages issued with message numbers that I can't find
> anywhere
When executing FTP in batch on z/OS V2R5 with the '-d' option in the JCL
PARM= field:
PARM='sitename.com -d (TIMEOUT 720'
we see a LOT of messages issued with message numbers that I can't find
anywhere in any IBM doc. Examples are:
GV0792
MV0519
MF0905
MV0754
MV0756
CG3169
CG3171
CG3183
CZ1374
C
Hi Radoslaw,
Some thoughts from my many years of coding Flashcopy ..
Flashcopy Consistency groups created using Flashcopy across multiple volumes
are "application dependent write consistentt" and designed for use with
applications that maintain a log or journal.
The flashcopy source image
You might want to change the strcpy because you might get a storage
overflow. Better to get length with strength, then allocate a big enough
buffer
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024, 18:07 Eric Erickson wrote:
> I have not done any serious JNI work in about 20+ years and it was on
> another platform (OS/2)
Thanks I work for the IRS and guarding tax payer data is chief priority
So security is a big deal
Getting racf caused me at one time to lose my telework rights
I do live whitin the 200 mile radius of my POD
As mandated but it would be a real hard ship to travel at this point close
to 60 miles t
I don't think so, according to the documentation the 3rd parameter tells the
GetString function whether to make a copy or not. And the __atoe does an
inplace xlate so its not making any copies either. I think we are just getting
lucky that the garbage collection is not getting run until after th
I'm pretty sure the answer is Yes.
ALLOC DD(IDIOFF) DUMMY
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Joseph Reichman
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 12:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Turning off fault analyzer IDIOFF
Hi
I am having loads of problem
I was thinking the same thing. The __atoe function must be making a copy of
the string and sticking it in the msg variable, and the strcpy is operating
on that.
Joe
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 12:29 PM Colin Paice <
059d4daca697-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> ... mark 2 answer.
> Perhap
> On the z/OS 3.1 volumes (DLIB and RES), when I select a dataset from the 3.4
> dslist of the entire 3.1 dlib volume (in my sample the dataset is
> AOP.AAOPEXEC but it happens for every dataset on the volume), I get the
> dataset allocation shown in bytes
> If I go to a z/OS 2.5 dlib volume an
Hi
I am having loads of problems debugging my program under tso test at work
Fault analyzer gets in the way causing a chain reaction which ends in a RACF
violation
The documentation says that coding
ALLOC FI(IDIOFF) will disable the invocation exits
Will coding this statement in my clist
... mark 2 answer.
Perhaps const char* msg=(*env)->GetStringUTFChars(env,jParm,0); returns
a copy of the string. So it can be released immediately.
The __atoe((char*) msg); works on the copy.
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 at 18:07, Eric Erickson wrote:
> I have not done any serious JNI work in about
It could be a bug.
Releasing the string, says put it on the list of storage to be garbage
collected. The garbage collection could be a long time after it's been
used, so the storage is still valid. Or it could have been released, and
put on a list of available storage. This storage was not reuse
I have not done any serious JNI work in about 20+ years and it was on another
platform (OS/2) rather than z/OS. But I've inherited some code and I noticed
something that I don't think is right, but would like to get a confirmation
from anyone with more experience. This is a code fragment as writ
Attila,
Thanks for that pointer, when we changed KEEP to FREE (well not all, but this
one) our heap memory issues went away. Now my real question is why didn't the
Heap Segments get reused. Since our high water memory reached a much lower mark
after the change, it appears our application was n
Likewise. Thanks to Darren, as well as all of you who add to the tremendous
value of this list.
Sent from [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) for iOS
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 8:46 AM, Steve Thompson <[ste...@wkyr.net](mailto:On
Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 8:46 AM, Steve Thompson < wrote:
> I am v
I am very glad and thankful to have this list as other similar
lists are in the trash heap of history. And I do appreciate
Darren's time at this.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
On 10/7/2024 11:04 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
Darren is a volunteer, and we should be grateful for however much of his
co
Yes I am permitted as I wrote it all myself.
Will share with you.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 9:38 AM David Spiegel <
0468385049d1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Hi Bert,
> Are you permitted to share your Rexx and Assembler?
> If yes, I would like get a copy.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Da
Hi Bert,
Sorry ... My email address is dspiegel...@hotmail.com
On 2024-10-07 10:34, Albertus de Wet wrote:
Peter
I have three "RESVOL complexes" and before I install maintenance I:
- copy the system datasets from the current, active resvol to the new
resvol. I do round-robin on them: (A -> B,
Hi Bert,
Are you permitted to share your Rexx and Assembler?
If yes, I would like get a copy.
Thanks and regards,
David
On 2024-10-07 10:34, Albertus de Wet wrote:
Peter
I have three "RESVOL complexes" and before I install maintenance I:
- copy the system datasets from the current, active re
Hi Peter,
I have two res packs sets ... For brevity, let's say A and B ... For my
maintenance system, I merely have one set. I RECEIVE and apply maint., after
backing (DFDSS) up the existing zones / datasets
Thereafter, I use a DUMP / RESTORE process (w/RENUNC) for my various systems.
Mor
Darren is a volunteer, and we should be grateful for however much of his
copious free time he is willing and able to devote to this list, instead of
whining that it is not enough.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
_
Hello Bert
Would you please help with the sample JCL for maintenance roll out JCL you
follow ?
My email: dbajava...@gmail.com
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024, 18:35 Albertus de Wet, <
062595278496-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Peter
>
> I have three "RESVOL complexes" and before I install main
Peter
I have three "RESVOL complexes" and before I install maintenance I:
- copy the system datasets from the current, active resvol to the new
resvol. I do round-robin on them: (A -> B, B -> C, C -> A, etc).
- copy all the ZFS files from A to B, (with rename) that includes the new
complex name.
Moderator is a volunteer position, performed outside of regular duties and
slipped in among those. As such, I would submit that criticizing him for being
judicious and assuming listmates are adults is probably not appropriate.
And it's "Darren", BTW. (Muphry's Law of sorts?)
-Original Messa
I think moderator Darrel should have nipped it in the bud when the first post
was made. By his laissez-faire attitude this topic spiraled out of control.A
stricter control on topic other than technical should be exacted by the dormant
moderator.
Amen.
On Sunday, October 6, 2024 at 09:49
Thank you all very much for your help
Your input has been, as always, enlightning.
We have been able to find the culprit. The automation team is using an API
to reach Netview from a web based program and there is something between
those two that is not behaving as exepected. They are now debugging
33 matches
Mail list logo
