>If PDSE solves the issue, what reason do they have to update JES3?
I am not requesting an update to JES3. I am requesting that JES2 be updated to
include a function that has been available in JES3 for a long time.
>I'd prefer to see greater compatibility between PDSE and UNIX directories:
>PDSE
I agree; we don't know how well JES2 and PDSE play together. If IBM rejects
the RFE because PDSE solves the issue, we will likely initiate plans to convert
the problem dataset to PDSE. Regardless, I believe IBM should update JES2 to
include the JES3 function provided by //*MAIN UPDATE=
Your vo
Dynamic proclibs is indicated in the Subject.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Yes, our application proclib in PROC00 is a PDS. If JES2 is never down and the
proclib is never closed by all members at the same time, when would PDSE
reclaim any freespace? What did I miss in this thread?
--
For IBM-MAIN sub
Exactly. In our case, a frequently used started task is being impacted. Thus
the request for a method to stall C/I for a very short time.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@l
Why would JES need to use STOW DISC? JES is not making the update. It is
reading a member and sometimes an old pointer happens to be "valid".
I am requesting a method that prevents/stalls C/I from reading a PROCLIB while
the compress job runs. For us, the is typically less than two seconds. O
yes.
Thanks for asking, please vote!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Paul, I have not found any IBM doc to indicate that PDSE solves the problem.
The JES2 Init&Tuning Guide simply says:
To ensure performance and integrity, do not:
v Allocate additional extents or release extents
v Compress a PROCLIB data set
v Defragment (move) a volume containing a PROCLIB
My un
In the meantime, we will be initiating actions to reduce the update activity of
our PDS proclib.
Thanks for your support
//* Bruce Schaefer
//* Worldpay - Mainframe Platform Services
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arc
Why does IEAMBDLG skip OPERLOG entries created by USS?
SYS1.SAMPLIVB(IEAMDBLG)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 487 Line(s) not Displayed
046010 * $L2=DCRA990 HBB7730 050525 PDKX: Skip MDB if MDB has been sent *
046020 * from USS
I apologize that I forgot about my initial post.
First, I realize that my memory failed me when I issued D
PROG,LNKLST,NAME=lnklstset,USERS. I hope the syntax is now burned in.
Second, I tried Peter's suggestion:
-setprog apf,add,dsn=a.b,sms apf,delete,dsn=a.b,sms
CSV410I SMS-MAN
When I was using D PROG,LNKLST,NAME=prior-set,USERS and it didn't give me an
error or the list of users, I wish it knew what I meant :)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@l
Hello list,
Am I wrong to expect the same response from these commands:
D PROG,LNKLST,USERS,NAME=CURRENT
D PROG,LNKLST,NAME=CURRENT,USERS
On my z/OS 1.12 systems, anything after NAME=CURRENT is ignored, including
invalid options.
Thanks
-
13 matches
Mail list logo
