I wonder about the accuracy of this article saying that IBM was involved in the
1890 census. From IBM history:
IBM, in full International Business Machines Corporation, leading American
computer manufacturer, with a major share of the market both in the United
States and abroad. Its
Again I am sorry but at this point I believe you cannot issue a CALL for a
program in 64 bits. I do nothing when switching back and forth with my CALLs.
In a message dated 4/4/2019 11:09:16 AM Venezuela Standard Time,
mutazi...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 15:03:43 +, Gene Hudders
in the code that
would require eliminating the HO X'80' bit? Maybe that is why IBM from the
beginning only defined 31 bits instead of 32.
Gene
In a message dated 4/4/2019 10:37:13 AM Venezuela Standard Time,
mutazi...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:22:16 +, Gene Hudders wrote
How is the system going to interpret the X'80' used to indicate the end of a
CALL parameter list. Today you just load it into a register and use it because
it is interpreted as a 31 bit address. If you are using AM32, this address is
not the one you want. and would require adding code to
Hi:
You can also get excellent CICS/DB2 trainning at Circle.
Regards,
Gene
In a message dated 11/26/2017 1:35:30 PM SA Western Standard Time,
surecha...@gmail.com writes:
Dear Venkat
You can find CICS and Db2 courses at Marist IDCP, Poughkeepsie, NY, U.S.
You may contact Mr. Angelo
Hi:
The average record size is probably one of the nonsense parameters in the
CLUSTER definition. It is my understanding that it is used primarily when
you define the space requirements in RECORDS versus Cylinders and Tracks. Do
you really know the average record size? I am not completely
Hi:
I can't say for sure, but my guess is there's something
'not-quite-right' in the enqueueing logic that is supposed to be protecting the
dataset
from being updated by CICS and batch simultaneously.
ATTRIBUTES
KEYLEN30 AVGLRECL2965
or
ICM Rx,B'',CURRENT
JZ SKIP
A Rx,SUM
STRx,SUM
SKIPDS0H
In a message dated 2/16/2014 8:51:07 A.M. Atlantic Standard Time,
mike.a.sch...@gmail.com writes:
Would this be even faster?
CLC CURRENT,=F'0'
JZ
You should worry more about the CLC that has two references to storage
In a message dated 2/16/2014 8:58:08 A.M. Atlantic Standard Time,
allan.stal...@kbmg.com writes:
Without testing, I believe ICM will be much slower than LOAD
HTH
Snip
or
ICM Rx,B'',CURRENT
JZ SKIP
A
