Hi Steve,
None of my data classes have "force SDB" set.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Smith
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 1:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: SMS confusion on when system
Check to see if your SMS ACS routine assigned a Data Class that has the
"force SDB" option set.
sas
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 12:42 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Good idea, unfortunately ours is set to NOBLOCK0.
>
> Rex
>
>
Hi Mike,
Good idea, unfortunately ours is set to NOBLOCK0.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mike Schwab
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 10:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: SMS confusion on when system determined blocksize
sion List On Behalf Of
Mike Schwab
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 10:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: SMS confusion on when system determined blocksize is
used
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/cobol-zos/6.2?topic=entries-block-contains-clause__;!!
f Of Rob
Schramm
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 10:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: SMS confusion on when system determined blocksize is
used
Pretty sure the Using Data Sets should describe what is happening.
I do not understand is the Non-sms data set that you say is unbl
