Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Instruction speeds

2019-08-13 Thread Seymour J Metz
List on behalf of Mike Shaw Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 10:33 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Instruction speeds On 8/12/2019 9:33 PM, Christopher Y. Blaicher wrote: > ..> > JUMPs are faster than BRANCHes. > . I don't know what you mean by

[SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Instruction speeds

2019-08-13 Thread Gord Tomlin
On 2019-08-13 10:33, Mike Shaw wrote: JNE generates the same machine instruction as BNE, etc. Nope. Are you possibly fooling yourself by looking at code that uses IEABRC or IEABRCX? -- Regards, Gord Tomlin Action Software International (a division of Mazda Computer Corporation) Tel: (905)

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Instruction speeds

2019-08-13 Thread Charles Mills
DU] On Behalf Of Mike Shaw Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 7:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Instruction speeds On 8/12/2019 9:33 PM, Christopher Y. Blaicher wrote: > ..> > JUMPs are faster than BRANCHes. > . I don't know what you m

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Instruction speeds

2019-08-13 Thread Brian Chapman
Mike, I believe the difference is related to the fact that branch instructions require a base register and jump does not. Thank you, Brian Chapman On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:40 AM Mike Shaw wrote: > On 8/12/2019 9:33 PM, Christopher Y. Blaicher wrote: > > ..> > > JUMPs are faster than

[SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Instruction speeds

2019-08-13 Thread Mike Shaw
On 8/12/2019 9:33 PM, Christopher Y. Blaicher wrote: ..> JUMPs are faster than BRANCHes. . I don't know what you mean by that Chris. The various types of Jump instructions are just extended mnemonics for various types of Branch instructions. JNE generates the same machine instructio