Re: ADR144E

2017-03-22 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Peter Hunkeler wrote: >>In that OP's job, I see UNIT=3390, that is DASD, not tape. I agree that job >>is looking at VTOC, not Catalog. >How embarrassing. I don't know what fooled me to believe it was about tape >data sets. Maybe the NOTAPE DDname, but that one was OUTDDNAME, in combination

Re: ADR144E

2017-03-22 Thread Peter Hunkeler
I am trying to troubleshoot a user's job which is using ADRDSSU. >>>That job is DELETING the datasets on the selected volsers. Is that what the >>>user wants? >> >>Does it? The JCL is referring to the tape by VOL=SER=, not via catalog. > >In that OP's job, I see UNIT=3390, that is DASD, not

Re: AW: Re: ADR144E

2017-03-21 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Peter Hunkeler wrote: >>>I am trying to troubleshoot a user's job which is using ADRDSSU. >>That job is DELETING the datasets on the selected volsers. Is that what the >>user wants? >Does it? The JCL is referring to the tape by VOL=SER=, not via catalog. In that OP's job, I see UNIT=3390, that

AW: Re: ADR144E

2017-03-21 Thread Peter Hunkeler
>>I am trying to troubleshoot a user's job which is using ADRDSSU. >> >That job is DELETING the datasets on the selected volsers. Is that what the >user wants? Does it? The JCL is referring to the tape by VOL=SER=, not via catalog. Non-SMS DASD data sets are deleted from the volume but not

Re: ADR144E

2017-03-20 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
willie bunter wrote: >I am trying to troubleshoot a user's job which is using ADRDSSU. That job is DELETING the datasets on the selected volsers. Is that what the user wants? >I cannot find the reason why the job fails on a : Others kindly gave you good replies about the INCLUDE filter. Just

Re: ADR144E

2017-03-20 Thread willie bunter
John, Thanks for pointing out the error : ** - Thanks to all who responded. On Mon, 3/20/17, John McKown <john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> wrote: Subject: Re: ADR144E To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Received: Monday, March 20, 2017, 9:18 AM

Re: ADR144E

2017-03-20 Thread John McKown
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 8:12 AM, willie bunter < 001409bd2345-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Good Day To All, > > I am trying to troubleshoot a user's job which is using ADRDSSU. I cannot > find the reason why the job fails on a : > > ADR144E (00

Re: ADR144E

2017-03-20 Thread Burrell, Todd
Shouldn't the filter be something like INCLUDE( ** )? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of willie bunter Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 9:12 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: ADR144E Good Day To All, I am trying

ADR144E

2017-03-20 Thread willie bunter
Good Day To All, I am trying to troubleshoot a user's job which is using ADRDSSU. I cannot find the reason why the job fails on a : ADR144E (002)-RI03P(02), INCOMPLETE SPECIFICATION IN DATA SET REFERENCED BY DDNAME FILTERDD Below is the jcl