Re: ATTACH and IARV64

2020-01-22 Thread Peter Relson
Binyamin wrote: I believe that you have a misunderstanding of what "shared subpools" are. I share Binyamin's belief. Joseph R wrote: So if task B frees tasks A storage and it’s not shared I would get a B37 type error ? No, you get whatever you get when you reference freed storage. 0C4-xx is

Re: ATTACH and IARV64

2020-01-21 Thread Joseph Reichman
the longest time. > > Chris Blaicher > Technical Architect > Syncsort, Inc. > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Joseph Reichman > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 2:05 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTS

Re: ATTACH and IARV64

2020-01-21 Thread Christopher Y. Blaicher
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ATTACH and IARV64 [ External - This message has originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email ] So if task B frees tasks A storage and it’s not shared I would get a B37

Re: ATTACH and IARV64

2020-01-21 Thread Joseph Reichman
So if task B frees tasks A storage and it’s not shared I would get a B37 type error ? A related question if I load a program in task A task B can use it access and invoke it And even use it as a ( recovery routine just trying to figure out why recovery routine didn’t work ) Thanks > On

Re: ATTACH and IARV64

2020-01-21 Thread Binyamin Dissen
I believe that you have a misunderstanding of what "shared subpools" are. Any task in an address space has addressability to private storage of any other task. Nothing special is required for this. A "shared subpool" is one where those sharing the subpool can directly allocate and free the storag

Re: ATTACH and IARV64

2020-01-21 Thread Joseph Reichman
kely that you have bad address somewhere in your code/logic. > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of > Joseph Reichman > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 3:47 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: ATTACH and IARV64 >

Re: ATTACH and IARV64

2020-01-21 Thread Rob Scott
: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ATTACH and IARV64 EXTERNAL EMAIL I got a soc4 pic 11 in a subtask I didn’t use the TTOKEN parameter Let me look again Thanks > On Jan 21, 2020, at 10:42 AM, Rob Scott wrote: > > You do not need REQUEST=GETSHARED. > > IARV64 REQUE

Re: ATTACH and IARV64

2020-01-21 Thread Joseph Reichman
seph Reichman > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 3:19 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: ATTACH and IARV64 > > EXTERNAL EMAIL > > > > > > Under to 2GB bar the attach has a parameter SHSPV parameter to share storage > or subpool

Re: ATTACH and IARV64

2020-01-21 Thread Rob Scott
rame Discussion List On Behalf Of Joseph Reichman Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 3:19 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: ATTACH and IARV64 EXTERNAL EMAIL Under to 2GB bar the attach has a parameter SHSPV parameter to share storage or subpool with another task in the same address space

ATTACH and IARV64

2020-01-21 Thread Joseph Reichman
Under to 2GB bar the attach has a parameter SHSPV parameter to share storage or subpool with another task in the same address space Above the 2GB I am assuming I would need to do a GETSHARED request ? -- For IBM-MAIN subsc