Re: AW: Follow-on: S0C4-11 abend caused by BASSM to address with all X'00' bytes

2016-07-26 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Peter Hunkeler wrote: >As expected, having the dump information inline did not work out. I'm >reposting with an attachement. Hopefully this will work better. I could see both attachments from IBM-MAIN web site. Thanks, it is working well including formatting too inside those attachments. Your

AW: Follow-on: S0C4-11 abend caused by BASSM to address with all X'00' bytes

2016-07-26 Thread Peter Hunkeler
As expected, having the dump information inline did not work out. I'm reposting with an attachement. Hopefully this will work better. In (late) response to Jim Mulder's comment: >How about the TRNE and BEA fields in that same XSB? and Tom Marchant's comment: >If you show the exact inform

AW: Follow-on: S0C4-11 abend caused by BASSM to address with all X'00' bytes

2016-07-26 Thread Peter Hunkeler
Oopps, I was afraid of that. Does IBM-MAIN allow attachements? Can't remember, but will try. -- Peter Hunkeler *** CEEDUMP data folows: CEE3DMP V2 R1.0: Condition processing resulted in the unhandled condition. 07/15/16 12:12:28 AMASID: 0159 Job ID: J0274722 Job name: P07W04UA