AW: Re: Active versus archive log data sets in DB2

2016-02-10 Thread Peter Hunkeler
> You could join, if you have not done so, the DB2 List for a more focused > group discussing DB2. >To join, it is free, go to idug.org Haven't I said in my post that I do not want to subscribe? -- Peter Hunkeler -- For IBM

AW: Re: Active versus archive log data sets in DB2

2016-02-10 Thread Peter Hunkeler
>No, an offloaded active log dataset is only marked "reusable". Reusable logs >are used as far back as possible in rollback/recovery. >http://www.idug.org/p/fo/et/thread=23811 Thanks, Norbert. Still not a pointer to a manual but it sounds reasonably trustworthy. Thanks for this link. The rest

AW: Re: Active versus archive log data sets in DB2

2016-02-10 Thread Peter Hunkeler
Thank you, Radoslav. >Regarding buffers I think you ar wrong. Buffers are heavily used for tables, but not for log. Due to transaction integrity active log is immediately written to DASD. I've read this in the DB2 V11 for z/OS Administeaion Guide where is says (page 327): How DB2 creates log r