AW: Re: BPXOINIT and SYSPLEX Mode Question

2014-10-23 Thread Peter Hunkeler
> Q). It says "The Modify Function Cannot Be Performed". Besides turning on > SYSPLEX=YES, how can I get BPXOINIT to do a FILESYS=DISPLAY? Yes, I can work > with "D OMVS,F" for Filesystems, but the RedBook on z/OS V1R13 Implementation > shows that bpxoinit can tell me the UID and the OWNER. Exce

AW: Re: BPXOINIT and SYSPLEX Mode Question

2014-10-23 Thread Peter Hunkeler
> My "fuser -cu /tmp" command shows many users of /tmp: > > fuser -cu > /tmp > /SYSTEM/tmp: 8c(IBMUSER) 25c(RMFGAT) 50331938(IBMUSER) > 33554852c(AUTO2)> > fuser says these are TSO USERIDs. But when I enter "d > omvs,u=IBMUSER" I get back > IBMUSER NOT FOUND. With "ps -ef" I can see the > PIDS

AW: Re: BPXOINIT and SYSPLEX Mode Question

2014-10-24 Thread Peter Hunkeler
> So HEX PID 50331938 is DEC 1345526072 My bad. I didn't lookup the description of fuser. due to the "c" in the process id of the first process, I was concluding it was a hex value. It is not, it is decimal! The "c" is a usage indicator. So drop any trailing "c" or "r" from the process id and

AW: Re: BPXOINIT and SYSPLEX Mode Question

2014-10-24 Thread Peter Hunkeler
> Displays process information for all processes associated with the specified > TSO/E user ID. The problem is that some documentation is using some terms inappropriately. "TSO Userid" being one of the terms. z/OS UNIX books mostly thoughtlessly talk about "TSO Userid" when they actually mea

AW: Re: BPXOINIT and SYSPLEX Mode Question

2014-10-25 Thread Peter Hunkeler
> When we move from V1R13 to V1R2 the superuser stuff will change. Not sure what you mean. BPX.DEFAULT.USER goes away, but this has nothing to do with superuser. > So far with the superuser changes we have been getting hit with OWNERSHIP > issues in regards to IBMUSER in the filesystems. Owner