: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 2:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] AW: Re: AW: Re: Dataclass question
W dniu 2018-01-30 o 20:48, Ron hawkins pisze:
> Peter,
>
> Start using PDS-E
>
> I used to like to have maxextents set to 8. That worked for all but the most
W dniu 2018-01-30 o 20:48, Ron hawkins pisze:
Peter,
Start using PDS-E
I used to like to have maxextents set to 8. That worked for all but the most
pathological of PDSs with many members updated per day. PDS-E ended up
resolving that (but Lizette has some horror stories about large PDS-E).
, January 30, 2018 10:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] AW: Re: AW: Re: Dataclass question
>What is your concern with secondary extents on a PDS?
I don't have a problem with secondary extents as such. It is only that I fear
the 16 extent limit may me reached sooner with sp
tents on a PDS?
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 10:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] AW: Re: Dataclass question
>I probably would not have DSORG=PO sh
>I probably would not have DSORG=PO sharing the same MGMTCLAS with batch files.
Interesting differentiation. I do not contradict per se, but attributes should
be different for DSORG=PS versus DSORG=PO, and DSORGP=PO-E.
>I agree COND IMMED or CONDITIONAL is more appropriate for PDS.
No,
