Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Alter access to datasets
On 28 Apr 2016 18:43:27 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:<9982011699705061.wa.gsg808yahoo@listserv.ua.edu>)
0053fe88ed35-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (gsg) wrote:
>As part of a systems programmer duties,
arles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of gsg
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 12:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Alter access to datasets
Unable to access the first link tot he Share doc.
Does this auditing go down
sg
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 12:02 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Alter access to datasets
>
> Unable to access the first link tot he Share doc.
>
> Does this auditing go down to the record level?
>
Unable to access the first link tot he Share doc.
Does this auditing go down to the record level?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IB
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Arthur
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 9:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Alter access to datasets
On 28 Apr 2016 18:43:27 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:&
Does anyone know if the STGADMIN Facility Class will allow the Storage Guys to
ALTER a dataset that they do not have direct access to? The RACF Administrator
thought we could remove the ALTER access from our SYSPROGs and that the Storage
guys could ALTER in the event of problems. ex. running o
ex. CAI.OPS.OPSLOG or COMPWARE.LMS.CHKPTA
The concern is someone will do something and try to delete a log entry to cover
their tracks. These are mostly ISV products that I'd think would be tracked in
SMF records. My thought would be to accept the risk, since these are not
critical datasets.
gsg wrote:
>As part of a systems programmer duties, they have ALTER access to many
>datasets. They need/require this access to install, upgrade, maintain and
>resolve problems. Audit has been pushing more and more to remove the ALTER
>access.
>Has anyone else been experiencing this?
Nearly
On 28 Apr 2016 18:43:27 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:<9982011699705061.wa.gsg808yahoo@listserv.ua.edu>)
0053fe88ed35-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (gsg) wrote:
As part of a systems programmer duties, they have ALTER
access to many datasets. They need/require this access
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 20:43:35 -0500, gsg wrote:
>As part of a systems programmer duties, they have ALTER access to many
>datasets. They need/require this access to install, upgrade, maintain and
>resolve problems. Audit has been pushing more and more to remove the
>ALTER access.
What data set
As part of a systems programmer duties, they have ALTER access to many
datasets. They need/require this access to install, upgrade, maintain and
resolve problems. Audit has been pushing more and more to remove the ALTER
access.
Has anyone else been experiencing this?
11 matches
Mail list logo