Re: Alter access to datasets

2016-05-16 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Mainframe Discussion List Subject: Re: Alter access to datasets On 28 Apr 2016 18:43:27 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main (Message-ID:<9982011699705061.wa.gsg808yahoo@listserv.ua.edu>) 0053fe88ed35-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (gsg) wrote: >As part of a systems programmer duties,

Re: Alter access to datasets

2016-04-29 Thread Charles Mills
arles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of gsg Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 12:02 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Alter access to datasets Unable to access the first link tot he Share doc. Does this auditing go down

Re: Alter access to datasets

2016-04-29 Thread Lizette Koehler
sg > Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 12:02 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Alter access to datasets > > Unable to access the first link tot he Share doc. > > Does this auditing go down to the record level? >

Re: Alter access to datasets

2016-04-29 Thread gsg
Unable to access the first link tot he Share doc. Does this auditing go down to the record level? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IB

Re: Alter access to datasets

2016-04-29 Thread Charles Mills
Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Arthur Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 9:32 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Alter access to datasets On 28 Apr 2016 18:43:27 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main (Message-ID:&

Re: Alter access to datasets

2016-04-29 Thread gsg
Does anyone know if the STGADMIN Facility Class will allow the Storage Guys to ALTER a dataset that they do not have direct access to? The RACF Administrator thought we could remove the ALTER access from our SYSPROGs and that the Storage guys could ALTER in the event of problems. ex. running o

Re: Alter access to datasets

2016-04-29 Thread gsg
ex. CAI.OPS.OPSLOG or COMPWARE.LMS.CHKPTA The concern is someone will do something and try to delete a log entry to cover their tracks. These are mostly ISV products that I'd think would be tracked in SMF records. My thought would be to accept the risk, since these are not critical datasets.

Re: Alter access to datasets

2016-04-29 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
gsg wrote: >As part of a systems programmer duties, they have ALTER access to many >datasets. They need/require this access to install, upgrade, maintain and >resolve problems. Audit has been pushing more and more to remove the ALTER >access. >Has anyone else been experiencing this? Nearly

Re: Alter access to datasets

2016-04-28 Thread Arthur
On 28 Apr 2016 18:43:27 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main (Message-ID:<9982011699705061.wa.gsg808yahoo@listserv.ua.edu>) 0053fe88ed35-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (gsg) wrote: As part of a systems programmer duties, they have ALTER access to many datasets. They need/require this access

Re: Alter access to datasets

2016-04-28 Thread Tom Marchant
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 20:43:35 -0500, gsg wrote: >As part of a systems programmer duties, they have ALTER access to many >datasets. They need/require this access to install, upgrade, maintain and >resolve problems. Audit has been pushing more and more to remove the >ALTER access. What data set

Alter access to datasets

2016-04-28 Thread gsg
As part of a systems programmer duties, they have ALTER access to many datasets. They need/require this access to install, upgrade, maintain and resolve problems. Audit has been pushing more and more to remove the ALTER access. Has anyone else been experiencing this?