Re: Any challenges with setting CSCBLOC to ABOVE

2018-05-02 Thread Lizette Koehler
:42 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Any challenges with setting CSCBLOC to ABOVE > > Just a curiosity. Some shops are still coding CSCBLOC=BELOW but the default > at > 2.1 is ABOVE > > Description under MAXUSER States: > > However, too large a buffer can

Re: Any challenges with setting CSCBLOC to ABOVE

2018-05-01 Thread Anthony Thompson
environment, such as a testplex. Ant. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Wednesday, 2 May 2018 12:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Any challenges with setting CSCBLOC to ABOVE Just a curiosity

Any challenges with setting CSCBLOC to ABOVE

2018-05-01 Thread Lizette Koehler
Just a curiosity. Some shops are still coding CSCBLOC=BELOW but the default at 2.1 is ABOVE Description under MAXUSER States: However, too large a buffer can cause the system to allocate more system resources than are needed during a given IPL. The excessive allocation of system resources becaus