Re: Application necessities was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-07-19 Thread Bob Bridges
Is that _The Mythical Man-Month_? Excellent book. A few decades ago my boss bought a bunch of copies and passed them around; I read it with much interest and have valued its lessons since then. ...Come to think of it, I should get myself a copy and reread it. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmai

Re: Application necessities was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-07-18 Thread Stefan Skoglund
tor 2020-07-16 klockan 23:12 -0300 skrev Clark Morris: > > And will they have an adequate test mechanism for both online and > batch? The hardest part of my job where I worked was getting a > coordinated set of test data that I could use as a base. I also have > come to the conclusion that the w

Re: Application necessities was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-07-16 Thread Seymour J Metz
PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Application necessities was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years? [Default] On 16 Jul 2020 10:34:40 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main sme...@gmu.edu (Seymour J Metz) wrote: >The claim that COBOL is English like is every bit as bogus as the claim that >rew

Application necessities was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-07-16 Thread Clark Morris
[Default] On 16 Jul 2020 10:34:40 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main sme...@gmu.edu (Seymour J Metz) wrote: >The claim that COBOL is English like is every bit as bogus as the claim that >rewriting existing COBOL applications in another language will magically fix >problems of underfunding, understa