In 13124718-8ee3-4c31-8feb-bd43bc571...@comcast.net, on 04/28/2014
at 01:48 PM, Micheal Butz michealb...@comcast.net said:
I think my problem maybe that I am doing a LOAD DE= after the BLDL
The DE may not be kosher for APF
DE is fine.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Did a explicit load ep=
And it didn't abend
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 28, 2014, at 6:36 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In 13124718-8ee3-4c31-8feb-bd43bc571...@comcast.net, on 04/28/2014
at 01:48 PM, Micheal Butz michealb...@comcast.net said:
I think
As the DE data starts after the BLDL header.
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:18:57 -0500 Walt Farrell walt.farr...@gmail.com
wrote:
:Perhaps you specified the DE information incorrectly?
:
: Walt
:
:On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 07:28:30 -0400, Micheal Butz michealb...@comcast.net
wrote:
:
:Did a explicit load
In 060650a7-d2a2-4313-8191-8f57c9a9b...@comcast.net, on 04/29/2014
at 07:28 AM, Micheal Butz michealb...@comcast.net said:
Did a explicit load ep=
And it didn't abend
I'm confused; I thought that you had successfully done a LOAD DE= but
that it had an unexpected value in R1.
--
Load de ended with I believe CSV028I not in APF concatenation
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 29, 2014, at 8:23 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In 060650a7-d2a2-4313-8191-8f57c9a9b...@comcast.net, on 04/29/2014
at 07:28 AM, Micheal Butz
No, the module address is in R0.
===
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:06:34 -0400
From: hal9...@panix.com
Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
At 22:46 -0400 on 04/27/2014, MichealButz wrote about Autorization
Code Question:
I have a module in APF
from my iPhone
On Apr 28, 2014, at 8:42 AM, J R jayare...@hotmail.com wrote:
No, the module address is in R0.
===
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:06:34 -0400
From: hal9...@panix.com
Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
At 22:46 -0400 on 04/27/2014
] On
Behalf Of Micheal Butz
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 12:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question
Prior to this I got an error running under TESTAUTH that the module was
loaded from an non-APF authorize data set
Apparently this is the problem
Sent from
(352) 273-1298
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Micheal Butz
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 9:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question
Yes I did
Both libs in the steplib are APF auth
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Micheal Butz
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 9:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question
Yes I did
Both libs in the steplib are APF auth
One PROGXX one dynamic via setprog double
of Florida
(352) 273-1298
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Micheal Butz
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 10:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question
I just had a thought I am running this under
I know. I was responding to Mr. Rosenberg's comment.
===
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:15:40 -0400
From: michealb...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
But the AC code is in R1
I am getting a csv028i abend under TESTAUTH that the loaded
09:15:40 -0400
From: michealb...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: Autorization Code Question
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
But the AC code is in R1
I am getting a csv028i abend under TESTAUTH that the loaded module didn't
come from a APF authorized lib
I have 2 load lobs in steplib one is APF
I have a module in APF authorized Library that is linkedit AC=1 when I load
this module shouldn't the high order byte of R1 be X'01'
Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
At 22:46 -0400 on 04/27/2014, MichealButz wrote about Autorization
Code Question:
I have a module in APF authorized Library that is linkedit AC=1 when I load
this module shouldn't the high order byte of R1 be X'01'
I do not think the APF Flag can be there. R1 is the where the module
Yes as long as all datasets in steplib or joblib are APF authorized.
Jon Perryman.
- Original Message -
From: MichealButz michealb...@comcast.net
I have a module in APF authorized Library that is linkedit AC=1 when I load
this module shouldn't the high order byte of R1 be X'01'
Prior to this I got an error running under TESTAUTH that the module was loaded
from an non-APF authorize data set
Apparently this is the problem
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 28, 2014, at 12:23 AM, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net wrote:
Yes as long as all datasets in steplib or joblib are
17 matches
Mail list logo
