To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Bad History (was: "make" question)
On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 16:58:15 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>
>... I would pick gmake 9/10 because it's pervasive and more
>portable. If you work with open source software on z/OS gmake is a must
>have.
>
I imagi
On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 18:29:37 -0600, John McKown wrote:
>>
>> RFE: We want UNIX.
>
>Not as I was told. U.S. Government said, basically, you can only bid a
>POSIX compliant (and branded?) system for any I.T. purchase. To keep their
>business, IBM grafted OpenEdition (original name) onto MVS. As
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 16:58:15 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
> >
> >... I would pick gmake 9/10 because it's pervasive and more
> >portable. If you work with open source software on z/OS
On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 16:58:15 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>
>... I would pick gmake 9/10 because it's pervasive and more
>portable. If you work with open source software on z/OS gmake is a must
>have.
>
I imagine:
RFE: We want UNIX.
IBM: Be more specific.
Both: (After much deliberation)
