Re: CDE Extension for RMODE 64

2023-12-27 Thread Peter Relson
R15 has bit 63 on I would assume Yes, reg 15 would be set up to be suitable for use by BSM 0,15 (AKA "pointer-defined") hence having bit 63 on when you want the target to be AMODE 64 (as you would need for an address above 2G). Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design

Re: CDE Extension for RMODE 64

2023-12-26 Thread Joseph Reichman
R15 has bit 63 on I would assume > On Dec 26, 2023, at 8:10 AM, Joseph Reichman wrote: > > Thank you > > Still working on CBT file 192 general recovery > > Routine > >> On Dec 26, 2023, at 8:08 AM, Peter Relson wrote: >> >>  >> when you say not every CDE is built by z/os are you

Re: CDE Extension for RMODE 64

2023-12-26 Thread Joseph Reichman
Thank you Still working on CBT file 192 general recovery Routine > On Dec 26, 2023, at 8:08 AM, Peter Relson wrote: > >  > when you say not every CDE is built by z/os are you referring to the > IDENTIFY Macro...? > > > No I am not. IDENTIFY is part of z/OS. > I am referring to

Re: CDE Extension for RMODE 64

2023-12-26 Thread Peter Relson
when you say not every CDE is built by z/os are you referring to the IDENTIFY Macro...? No I am not. IDENTIFY is part of z/OS. I am referring to non-z/OS programs that obtain storage for CDE's and chain them into the z/OS control structures such as the job pack queue TCBJPQ. Also I noticed

Re: CDE Extension for RMODE 64

2023-12-25 Thread Joseph Reichman
Peter Thanks when is you say not every CDE is built by z/os are you referring to the IDENTIFY Macro which a user can could a CDE using a. Address in storage Also I noticed that the retry address is only 4 bytes I guess then to you would have to retry to a label in the program that has

Re: CDE Extension for RMODE 64

2023-12-25 Thread Peter Relson
If bit CDCEX in the CDE meaning there is an CDE extension would that imply the module is RMODE 64 since CDXEntpt64 is a double word A simple glance at a CDE in storage for a module that is not RMODE 64 would show you that this is not the case. Every CDE built by z/OS has a CDX, as does

Re: CDE Extension for RMODE 64

2023-12-24 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 19:01:06 -0500, Joseph Reichman wrote: >Just trying to figure if a module is rmode 64 > AMBLIST? -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: CDE Extension for RMODE 64

2023-12-24 Thread Joseph Reichman
ָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf > of Joseph Reichman > Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2023 6:34 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: CDE Extension for RMODE 64 > > HI > > If bit CDCEX in the C

Re: CDE Extension for RMODE 64

2023-12-24 Thread Seymour J Metz
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: CDE Extension for RMODE 64 HI If bit CDCEX in the CDE meaning there is an CDE extension would that imply the module is RMODE 64 since CDXEntpt64 is a double word thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe

CDE Extension for RMODE 64

2023-12-24 Thread Joseph Reichman
HI If bit CDCEX in the CDE meaning there is an CDE extension would that imply the module is RMODE 64 since CDXEntpt64 is a double word thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email