Re: DS6800 3390 quesation

2013-03-09 Thread Ron Hawkins
on List [mailto:IBM- > m...@listserv.ua.edu] > >> On Behalf Of Miklos Szigetvari > >> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 3:31 AM > >> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > >> Subject: Re: DS6800 3390 quesation > >> > >> Hi > >> > >&

Re: DS6800 3390 quesation

2013-03-05 Thread Scott Ford
h 05, 2013 3:31 AM >> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >> Subject: Re: DS6800 3390 quesation >> >> Hi >> >> Thank you >> The guy installing this, insists to have a different control unit for >> every size > > ---

Re: DS6800 3390 quesation

2013-03-05 Thread EXT-Schwarz, Barry
Hire someone who knows what he is doing. > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Miklos Szigetvari > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 3:31 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: DS6800 3390 que

Re: DS6800 3390 quesation

2013-03-05 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <5135d788.2010...@isis-papyrus.com>, on 03/05/2013 at 12:31 PM, Miklos Szigetvari said: >The guy installing this, insists to have a different control unit for > every size That sounds like cargo-cult engineering. Have you considered going over his head and getting an answer from one of the

Re: DS6800 3390 quesation

2013-03-05 Thread Carlos Bodra
Hi, In IOCP/IOCDS we didn´t define volume type (3390-1, 3390-2, 3390-3, 3390-9 etc...), just define 3390. In DS6800 definition panels we define a runge of volumes with for example 3339 cyls for model 3 and another range with 10017 (model 9). Both ranges could be continuos addresses, 3390-3 from

Re: DS6800 3390 quesation

2013-03-05 Thread Miklos Szigetvari
Hi Thank you The guy installing this, insists to have a different control unit for every size On 05.03.2013 12:25, Mike Schwab wrote: 3390 is a device type. -1, -2, -3, -9, -27, -54, etc are different sizes of 3390s. On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Miklos Szigetvari wrote: Hi Thank

Re: DS6800 3390 quesation

2013-03-05 Thread Mike Schwab
3390 is a device type. -1, -2, -3, -9, -27, -54, etc are different sizes of 3390s. On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Miklos Szigetvari wrote: > Hi > > Thank you very much, I'm just wandering, but the technician says, every > device type needs a separate control unit > Try to look after this again

Re: DS6800 3390 quesation

2013-03-04 Thread Miklos Szigetvari
: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: DS6800 3390 quesation Hi We will got a DS6800, seems every model needs a separate control unit, so one for 3390-3, one for 3390-9, one for 3390-27 . Till now we had zDASD, we used over one control unit. Is this co

Re: DS6800 3390 quesation

2013-03-04 Thread EXT-Schwarz, Barry
M-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Miklos Szigetvari > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 5:22 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: DS6800 3390 quesation > > Hi > > We will got a DS6800, seems every model needs a separate control unit, > so one for 3390-3, one for

DS6800 3390 quesation

2013-03-04 Thread Miklos Szigetvari
Hi We will got a DS6800, seems every model needs a separate control unit, so one for 3390-3, one for 3390-9, one for 3390-27 . Till now we had zDASD, we used over one control unit. Is this correct ? -- Kind regards, / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Miklos Szigetvari Research& Development ISIS