3/25/2013, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re: Dataset
> >DELETE question : IEBFR14 vs IDCAMS:
> >
> >>On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:38:41 -0400, Steve Thompson
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>//SYSUT3 DD UNIT=3390,SPACE=(CYL,10),DISP=(NEW,CATLG)
> >>>
> &
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:21:00 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg
wrote:
>At 14:00 -0500 on 03/25/2013, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re: Dataset
>DELETE question : IEBFR14 vs IDCAMS:
>
>>On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:38:41 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
>>>
>>>//SYSUT3 DD UNIT=33
At 14:00 -0500 on 03/25/2013, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re: Dataset
DELETE question : IEBFR14 vs IDCAMS:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:38:41 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
Now, go whack the person that wrote the JCL that has the following
similarly coded DD statement:
//SYSUT3 DD UNIT=3390,SPACE
At 18:40 + on 03/25/2013, Gibney, Dave wrote about Re: Dataset
DELETE question : IEBFR14 vs IDCAMS:
Actually, the missing NVR (NonVsam Record) as suggested by Allan
should have accomplished the task. It basically tells IDCAMS not to
fail if the Catalog record is missing.
Dave Gibney
On 25 March 2013 14:32, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
> At 12:49 -0500 on 03/25/2013, Ducky duke wrote about Dataset DELETE question
>> Tried with IDCAMS DELETE :
>>
>> //STEP010 EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
>> //DD01 DD DSN=SYS12048.T104505.RA000.IBMUSER.R018,
>> // DISP=OLD,VOL=SER=WORK01,UNIT
nt
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 1:50 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Dataset DELETE question : IEBFR14 vs IDCAMS
>
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:41:52 -0500, Nguyen Dt wrote:
>
> >Tested the delete with IDCAMS NVR option, doesn't work .. do i miss
&
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 3:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Dataset DELETE question : IEBFR14 vs IDCAMS
>>Now,
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:41:52 -0500, Nguyen Dt wrote:
>Tested the delete with IDCAMS NVR option, doesn't work .. do i miss something
>?
...
>IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 102 - REASON CODE IS IGG0CLFP-7
"The data set was not deleted because it was open."
Did you even try to look up t
Tested the delete with IDCAMS NVR option, doesn't work .. do i miss something
?
(WORK03 is SMS managed)
/STEP010 EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
/SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
/DD01 DD DISP=OLD,VOL=SER=WORK03,UNIT=3390
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:00:49 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:38:41 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
>>
>>Now, go whack the person that wrote the JCL that has the following
>>similarly coded DD statement:
>>
>>//SYSUT3 DD UNIT=3390,SPACE=(CYL,10),DISP=(NEW,CATLG)
Has this ever b
From: "Pommier, Rex R."
Date: 03/25/2013 03:49 PM
Gil and Steve (and probably others who feel the same way),
Before you get too whack-happy, there are other reasons why something like
this could show up. At some point in the deep, dark past, if the system
fell over for whatever reason (
On 2013-03-25 13:44, Pommier, Rex R. wrote:
> Gil and Steve (and probably others who feel the same way),
>
> If IBM has added a cleanup routine, or if it is found that some poor JCL
> coder did code a DISP on a temporary dataset, then by all means, whack away.
> :-)
>
I often code (,PASS), an
set DELETE question : IEBFR14 vs IDCAMS
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:38:41 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
>
>Now, go whack the person that wrote the JCL that has the following
>similarly coded DD statement:
>
>//SYSUT3 DD UNIT=3390,SPACE=(CYL,10),DISP=(NEW,CATLG)
>
>This is what pro
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:38:41 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
>
>Now, go whack the person that wrote the JCL that has the following
>similarly coded DD statement:
>
>//SYSUT3 DD UNIT=3390,SPACE=(CYL,10),DISP=(NEW,CATLG)
>
>This is what produces a data set name like this:
>SYS12048.T104505.RA000.IBMUS
From: Ducky duke
Date: 03/25/2013 02:04 PM
Hi all,
I have some temporary files not deleted. Seen with 3.4 with volume given.
When i tried to delete them , i had an error message (entry not found)
Listcat gave this :
LISTCAT ENTRIES(SYS12048.T104505.RA000.IBMUSER.R018)
IDC3012I ENTR
nframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Robert A. Rosenberg
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:32 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Dataset DELETE question : IEBFR14 vs IDCAMS
>
> At 12:49 -0500 on 03/25/2013, Ducky duke wrote about D
At 12:49 -0500 on 03/25/2013, Ducky duke wrote about Dataset DELETE
question : IEBFR14 vs IDCAMS:
Hi all,
I have some temporary files not deleted. Seen with 3.4 with volume
given. When i tried to delete them , i had an error message (entry
not found)
Listcat gave this :
LISTCAT ENTRIES
DSN not Catalogued.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: Ducky duke
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:49:46
To:
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Dataset DELETE question
You do not mention whether the volume/dataset are SMS managed (or not).
DELETE FILE in idcams only uses the DD statement for volume/vvds access. It is
essentially trying to do a "normal delete" (including the catalog update).
IEFBR14 does not care if the dataset is cataloged or not. It merely l
Hi all,
I have some temporary files not deleted. Seen with 3.4 with volume given. When
i tried to delete them , i had an error message (entry not found)
Listcat gave this :
LISTCAT ENTRIES(SYS12048.T104505.RA000.IBMUSER.R018)
IDC3012I ENTRY SYS12048.T104505.RA000.IBMUSER.R01
20 matches
Mail list logo
