IMHO, there's no reason for the secrecy for this facility. But, not
my call. The messages can and are often displayed "publicly", so I
guess it makes sense to document them publicly. But really, that
message can hardly have any more explanation added to it. I should do
so well (typically, I'd h
> On Jan 11, 2018, at 9:34 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
>
> Message is documented publicly:
> https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.ieam900/m012363.htm
>
>
> Charles
>
Charles,
This sounds like the old CIA reply about If I tell you I got to kill you. Or
the
:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FMHLEN Size Parameter
I know about this field, which was disclosed under an NDA, so I'm not at
liberty to talk about it in public. I assume that neither are you.
So I suggest that a) you read that NDA you should have signed, and b) read the
m
I know about this field, which was disclosed under an NDA, so I'm not
at liberty to talk about it in public. I assume that neither are you.
So I suggest that a) you read that NDA you should have signed, and b)
read the manual. You've got a long way to go if you don't understand
this error.
sas
Hi,
Please advise... where is this parameter updated?
IGW01011T THE FMH SIZE IS LESS THAN THE MINIMUM ALLOWED. LENGTH SUPPLIED = 0
, MINIMUM REQUIRED = 104
Examine the FMHLEN field in the passed FMH and determine the type of request.
Increase
