On 5 April 2017 at 12:17, Charles Mills wrote:
> The nature of LISTSERV.
More the nature of Google, Yahoo, and Facebook, who have been
destroying mailing lists for several years now.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:03:55 -0400, Charles Mills wrote:
>Because the From address is not the same as the Sender address?
>
That's normal and as it should be. See the discussion and examples of
From: and Sender: in RFC 822. And the Received:s should trace back
to Sender:.
But some overzealous or
2017 12:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Failed fraud detection was: Copy / Save screen text function in
all TN3270 emulators?
Thanks.
H. I'm not sure why that would be. I see my addy in only one place below
and it looks correct.
Bill
-Original Message-
From
PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Failed fraud detection was: Copy / Save screen text function in
all TN3270 emulators?
Thanks.
H. I'm not sure why that would be. I see my addy in only one place below
and it looks correct.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainf
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Failed fraud detection was: Copy / Save screen text function in
all TN3270 emulators?
Because the From address is not the same as the Sender address?
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: charl...@mcn.org
Received: (qmail 11656 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2017 15:42:09
nframe Discussion List
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
From: "George, William@FTB"
Subject: Failed fraud detection was: Copy / Save screen text function in all
TN3270 emulators?
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Precedence: list
List-Help: <http://lis
Does anyone know why I might be receiving the "failed our fraud detection
checks" message?
I've been on the list for years.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of George, William@FTB
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2017 8:17
