I would like to verify that using fixcat category IBM.Device.Server.zBC12-2828
is the same as checking PSP BUCKETS for DEVICE 2828?
Thanks Matt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lis
Dazzo, Matt wrote:
I would like to verify that using fixcat category IBM.Device.Server.zBC12-2828
is the same as checking PSP BUCKETS for DEVICE 2828?
You really need to read the PSP and the appropriate level of the z/OS
Migration book's topic about migrating to a new server, but you won't
Behalf Of John Eells
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 1:32 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Fixcat vs Hardware PSP Buckets
>
> Dazzo, Matt wrote:
> > I would like to verify that using fixcat category IBM.Device.Server.zBC12-
> 2828 is the same as che
Pete wrote:
I'm actually going thru that process now and found the fixcat for z13s did not
pull in all the required service to support a z13 or z13s processor. I ended up
ordering the PSP bucket and viola! got all I needed.
using
REPORT MISSINGFIX
ZONES(MVST100)
FIXCAT(IBM.Device.Server.z
in between this time I received and the enhanced hold data...
Ah hah! I highly suspect the latest HOLDDATA is the reason for the
discrepancy. I'm pretty sure the PSP bucket instructs you to first get
the latest HOLDDATA before running the REPORT MISSINGFIX command. In
any case, glad to hea
Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
in between this time I received and the enhanced hold data...
Ah hah! I highly suspect the latest HOLDDATA is the reason for the
discrepancy. I'm pretty sure the PSP bucket instructs you to first get
the latest HOLDDATA before running the REPORT MISSINGFIX command.
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:42:23 -0400, John Eells wrote:
>Pete wrote:
And most of us don't know what it was that Pete wrote, because he
apparently posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main. Fortunately for him, this
time two knowledgeable people (John and Kurt) seem to have seen his
posts there and respond
