A bit OT, but this, I think, is a good idea: http://www.passwordcard.org/en
Best Regards,
Thomas Berg
___
Thomas Berg Specialist zOS/RQM/IT Delivery Swedbank AB (Publ)
-
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:15:32 -0500, Hobart Spitz wrote:
>Under z/VM, SFS has the capability for a user to have the ability to
>grant/revoke access to files and directories that are owned by the user's
>id. Thus, users can grant and revoke access to/from their own SFS
>resources without the bother
Under z/VM, SFS has the capability for a user to have the ability to
grant/revoke access to files and directories that are owned by the user's
id. Thus, users can grant and revoke access to/from their own SFS
resources without the bother of involving a security staffer, addressing
(1) above.
Perh
Happy Holidays my friend
Regards,
Scott
From: Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 8:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Why force your users to change passwords at all? I know "everyone does it"
but what problems does it solve?
1. Bob needs access to some dataset
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
> Why force your users to change passwords at all? I know "everyone does it"
> but what problems does it solve?
>
In all truthfullness, for me, the problem it solves is that keeps the
auditors off my ass. Is that a _good_, technical, reason
Why force your users to change passwords at all? I know "everyone does it"
but what problems does it solve?
1. Bob needs access to some dataset that his userid does not grant. So Alice
loans him her logon credentials. Forcing Alice to change her password
prevents Bob from continuing to masquerade
