In 2898629948738139.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
09/26/2012
at 08:56 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
I stand corrected. But still, if RECEIVE tolerates processing a
SYSMOD prior to its PRErequisites on the assumption that APPLY
will sort things out, I might hope
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:42:12 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
Perhaps even more relevant is the ordering among PREs and SUPs of PTFs,
where order of SYSMODs in SMPPTFIN under a single APPLY command doesn't
matter.
SMPPTFIN is not read during APPLY. That would be SMPPTS. PREs
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:56:21 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
But still, if RECEIVE tolerates processing a SYSMOD prior to its PRErequisites
on the assumption that
APPLY will sort things out, I might hope for the same flexibility with respect
to FMID.
RECEIVE doesn't so much
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:18:09 -0400, Kurt Quackenbush ku...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Presumably the MCS for each SYSMOD is in a unique data set? If so, then
yes, the order in which the archives for those data sets appear in the
GIMPAF.XML file determines the order in which they will be processed
during
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:24:32 -0500, Art Gutowski wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:18:09 -0400, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
Presumably the MCS for each SYSMOD is in a unique data set? If so, then
yes, the order in which the archives for those data sets appear in the
GIMPAF.XML file determines the order
Grrr. What determines the order of processing?
snip
OK. I think I have it. They appear to be processed in GIMPAF order.
Presumably the MCS for each SYSMOD is in a unique data set? If so, then
yes, the order in which the archives for those data sets appear in the
GIMPAF.XML file
I have (schematically) in SMPCNTL:
RECEIVE SELECT(
F1
F2
F3
) FROMNTS(SMPNTS-path)
And, variously in SMPNTS:
++ FUNCTION( F1 ) ...
++ FUNCTION( E2 ) ...
++ VER ... FMID( F1 ) ...
++ FUNCTION( E3 ) ...
++ VER ... FMID( F1 ) ...
And I get, in SMPOUT:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:20:21 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
I have (schematically) in SMPCNTL:
RECEIVE SELECT(
F1
E2 /* Renamed from OP. */
E3 /* Renamed from OP. */
) FROMNTS(SMPNTS-path)
And, variously in SMPNTS:
++ FUNCTION( F1 ) ...
++