In
a6cf87cbc0b60a459cb79af044a096db24a3dc9...@mailccr.us.syncsort.com,
on 10/23/2013
at 01:11 PM, Blaicher, Christopher Y. cblaic...@syncsort.com
said:
Personally, I would scan the TIOT and then if I found it I would do
the DEVTYPE.
Why? If you're going to scan the TIOT, why not use the
In 2650242851914412.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
10/25/2013
at 04:47 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:39:36 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
No. Even for unprivileged applications there is I/O that does not use
a ddename.
Are you
All,
Have you seen anyone using DEVTYPE macro to pickup the ddname information ?
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Oct 22, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Joel Riemer jrie...@ess.ca wrote:
The dynamic information retrieval function of dynamic
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Scott Ford
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Getting DD DISP
All,
Have you seen anyone using DEVTYPE macro to pickup the ddname information ?
Scott ford
-930-8260 | M: 512-627-3803
E: cblaic...@syncsort.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Scott Ford
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Getting DD DISP
All
-627-3803
E: cblaic...@syncsort.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Scott Ford
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 11:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Getting DD DISP
Chris,
Thank you, I saw someone
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Scott Ford
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 11:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Getting DD DISP
Chris,
Thank you, I saw someone had published, I use the word loosely on the 'NET'
was showing how
The dynamic information retrieval function of dynamic allocation services is an
option...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On 5/29/2013 7:46 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
The whole NEW/MOD behavior is incredibly complex when you factor in
the different behaviors for sequential versus partitioned datasets. I
fear this is going to start a whole I hate JCL digression, but MOD
means very different things for PDS versus
Is there an easy way for a program to get the DISP (NEW/MOD/SHR/OLD) of a
DD from the TIOT, or do you have to do a RDJFCB?
Thanks,
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Getting DD DISP
Is there an easy way for a program to get the DISP (NEW/MOD/SHR/OLD) of a DD
from the TIOT, or do you have to do a RDJFCB?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 2:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Getting DD DISP
Is there an easy way for a program to get the DISP (NEW/MOD/SHR/OLD) of a
DD
from the TIOT, or do you have to do a RDJFCB
On Wed, 29 May 2013 16:54:49 -0500, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
Is there an easy way for a program to get the DISP (NEW/MOD/SHR/OLD) of a
DD from the TIOT, or do you have to do a RDJFCB?
I'm somewhat curious why you'd want to know, from a program, Kirk.
But however you get it, I'll
Walt -
I have a reason where I would like to check for MOD. I'm aware that the
NEW bit can also be set.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Walt Farrell walt.farr...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, 29 May 2013 16:54:49 -0500, Kirk Wolf
, 2013 3:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Getting DD DISP
On Wed, 29 May 2013 16:54:49 -0500, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
Is there an easy way for a program to get the DISP (NEW/MOD/SHR/OLD) of
a DD from the TIOT, or do you have to do a RDJFCB?
I'm somewhat curious why you'd
15 matches
Mail list logo
