Much more efficient than name/token.
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 12:24:00 -0500 Peter Relson wrote:
:>It is, to me, quite surprising that anyone still uses SSAFF OBTAIN.
:>It is an inefficient way of accessing a small amount of data. To a good
:>degree, I think that name/token has superseded the
It is, to me, quite surprising that anyone still uses SSAFF OBTAIN.
It is an inefficient way of accessing a small amount of data. To a good
degree, I think that name/token has superseded the usefulness of SSAFF.
SSAFF will likely never be enhanced in any way.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology
I guess IBM has not yet had a need to issue it from a PC-SS routine. Now I
need to roll my own (which does not seem to be complex)
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from
